Designing Effective Empathy in AI Agents: An Empirical Study of User-Centric vs. Situation-Centric Approaches between Human and AI Agents

As generative AI systems play an increasing role in emotional support, scholars have raised concerns about discomfort, inauthenticity, and expectancy violations resulting from AI's empathic responses. Drawing on verbal person-centeredness theory, we propose User Centric Empathy (UCE: emotion-focused and validating) and Situation Centric Empathy (SCE: context-focused and redirecting) to identify a more effective AI empathy approach. Across two experiments, we investigate how empathy type (UCE vs. SCE) and agent type (human vs. AI) interact to shape user experience. The results indicate that, when expressed by an AI agent, situation-centric empathy (SCE) emerges as a more appropriate empathy strategy, as it reduces discomfort and inauthenticity. Interestingly, when blame is attributed to one’s own error rather than to external sources, the type of empathy expressed by the AI agent exerts no significant effect. These results highlight that the effectiveness of AI-delivered empathy depends less on mimicking human-like responses and more on adopting an appropriate empathy approach, showing that superficial mimicry cannot foster authentic relational outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Effective Empathy in AI Agents: An Empirical Study of User-Centric vs. Situation-Centric Approaches between Human and AI Agents

Il Im, Joohee Kim
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Designing Effective Empathy in AI Agents: An Empirical Study of User-Centric vs. Situation-Centric Approaches between Human and AI Agents

Il Im, Joohee Kim
article en

Abstract

As generative AI systems play an increasing role in emotional support, scholars have raised concerns about discomfort, inauthenticity, and expectancy violations resulting from AI's empathic responses. Drawing on verbal person-centeredness theory, we propose User Centric Empathy (UCE: emotion-focused and validating) and Situation Centric Empathy (SCE: context-focused and redirecting) to identify a more effective AI empathy approach. Across two experiments, we investigate how empathy type (UCE vs. SCE) and agent type (human vs. AI) interact to shape user experience. The results indicate that, when expressed by an AI agent, situation-centric empathy (SCE) emerges as a more appropriate empathy strategy, as it reduces discomfort and inauthenticity. Interestingly, when blame is attributed to one’s own error rather than to external sources, the type of empathy expressed by the AI agent exerts no significant effect. These results highlight that the effectiveness of AI-delivered empathy depends less on mimicking human-like responses and more on adopting an appropriate empathy approach, showing that superficial mimicry cannot foster authentic relational outcomes.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.