Tool, Assistant, or Advisor? Consumer Experience across Modalities in AI-Powered Product Search

This study investigates how different AI-powered search interface designs—traditional keyword search, AI-generated summaries, and conversational agents—influence users’ mental representations of AI and their subsequent evaluations and behaviors. Across an experimental design involving 345 participants, we found that interface modality significantly shaped how users conceptualized the AI system's role. Cluster analyses revealed three distinct user types with divergent expectations and evaluative priorities (e.g., as a tool, assistant, or advisor). These perceived roles, in turn, moderated how traditional usability constructs—perceived usefulness, ease of use, and control—predicted decision confidence and purchase intention. These factor are weighted differently within each cluster. Our findings show that interface design actively constructs interaction realities that guide technology acceptance and consumer behavior. We discuss implications for adaptive interface design and the ontological framing of AI in user experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tool, Assistant, or Advisor? Consumer Experience across Modalities in AI-Powered Product Search

Mike Yao, Weizi Liu, Lizi Ma
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
AI in Service Interactions
article

Tool, Assistant, or Advisor? Consumer Experience across Modalities in AI-Powered Product Search

Mike Yao, Weizi Liu, Lizi Ma
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how different AI-powered search interface designs—traditional keyword search, AI-generated summaries, and conversational agents—influence users’ mental representations of AI and their subsequent evaluations and behaviors. Across an experimental design involving 345 participants, we found that interface modality significantly shaped how users conceptualized the AI system's role. Cluster analyses revealed three distinct user types with divergent expectations and evaluative priorities (e.g., as a tool, assistant, or advisor). These perceived roles, in turn, moderated how traditional usability constructs—perceived usefulness, ease of use, and control—predicted decision confidence and purchase intention. These factor are weighted differently within each cluster. Our findings show that interface design actively constructs interaction realities that guide technology acceptance and consumer behavior. We discuss implications for adaptive interface design and the ontological framing of AI in user experience.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tool, Assistant, or Advisor? Consumer Experience across Modalities in AI-Powered Product Search — Mike Yao, Weizi Liu, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS