Governing Manipulative and Synthetic Content on Social Media Platforms

Social media platforms are immensely popular among young adults (13-20 years old). However, these platforms also pose distinct risks, including fraudulent advertisements and scams. The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) based advertising has exacerbated these risks, including deepfake scams. Using the integrated Governing Knowledge Commons-Contextual Integrity (GKC-CI) framework, we perform a structured content analysis of the policies from three stakeholders: social media platforms, foundational GenAI model providers, and GenAI-based advertising services. We analyze how these entities define and constrain the use of GenAI in social media advertising, with particular attention to protection for young adults against manipulative and synthetic GenAI content. We found that current governance lacks enforceable rules regarding GenAI, and are especially lacking in protecting young adults. We discuss implications for platforms and regulators to strengthen institutional governance for GenAI-based advertising targeting young adults.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing Manipulative and Synthetic Content on Social Media Platforms

Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo, Smirity Kaushik
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Governing Manipulative and Synthetic Content on Social Media Platforms

Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo, Smirity Kaushik
article en

Abstract

Social media platforms are immensely popular among young adults (13-20 years old). However, these platforms also pose distinct risks, including fraudulent advertisements and scams. The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) based advertising has exacerbated these risks, including deepfake scams. Using the integrated Governing Knowledge Commons-Contextual Integrity (GKC-CI) framework, we perform a structured content analysis of the policies from three stakeholders: social media platforms, foundational GenAI model providers, and GenAI-based advertising services. We analyze how these entities define and constrain the use of GenAI in social media advertising, with particular attention to protection for young adults against manipulative and synthetic GenAI content. We found that current governance lacks enforceable rules regarding GenAI, and are especially lacking in protecting young adults. We discuss implications for platforms and regulators to strengthen institutional governance for GenAI-based advertising targeting young adults.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.