Regulatory Intermediaries and Chains – the Complex Process of Sensemaking for AI Act Implementation in Finland

The European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act entered into force in August 2024. It aims to address different risks involved with AI systems. The regulation not only concerns organizations providing or deploying AI systems, but it mandates EU Member States to comply with the AI Act and change national law, if necessary. Member States act in the role of a regulatory intermediary (RI) for the AI Act. We conducted an interpretive case study to understand how a working group tasked with Finland’s national-level AI Act implementation made sense of changes the AI Act required to the national law for designation of National Competent Authorities. We contribute to Information Systems research by shedding light on the institutional process leading to new national law, highlighting Member States' role as an RI in implementing the AI Act on a national-level and introducing the concept of a regulatory chain involving multiple RIs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Intermediaries and Chains – the Complex Process of Sensemaking for AI Act Implementation in Finland

Karin Väyrynen, Erkki Tervo, Netta Iivari
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Regulatory Intermediaries and Chains – the Complex Process of Sensemaking for AI Act Implementation in Finland

Karin Väyrynen, Erkki Tervo, Netta Iivari
article en

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act entered into force in August 2024. It aims to address different risks involved with AI systems. The regulation not only concerns organizations providing or deploying AI systems, but it mandates EU Member States to comply with the AI Act and change national law, if necessary. Member States act in the role of a regulatory intermediary (RI) for the AI Act. We conducted an interpretive case study to understand how a working group tasked with Finland’s national-level AI Act implementation made sense of changes the AI Act required to the national law for designation of National Competent Authorities. We contribute to Information Systems research by shedding light on the institutional process leading to new national law, highlighting Member States' role as an RI in implementing the AI Act on a national-level and introducing the concept of a regulatory chain involving multiple RIs.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.