Investigating the Impact of Rewards and Sanctions on Developers’ Proactive AI Accountability Behavior

Accountability of artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems is often addressed reactively, mainly after harm occurs. This study shifts toward proactive approaches, highlighting AI developers’ role in risk mitigation. Proactive AI accountability behavior refers to self-initiated, future-oriented actions that go beyond formal job roles to justify developers’ actions and decisions, and to facilitate the clear attribution of accountability. Drawing on Proactive Motivation Theory, we conducted an online experiment (n = 264) to investigate how governance mechanisms (rewards vs. sanctions) and motivational states impact such behavior. Our results reveal flexible role orientation as the key driver of proactive behavior and how rewards and sanctions impact such a mindset. We contribute by conceptualizing proactive AI accountability behavior and providing a theoretical model that explains its emergence, underscoring the importance of using rewards to foster a proactive mindset alongside sanctions as guardrails against harmful initiatives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Impact of Rewards and Sanctions on Developers’ Proactive AI Accountability Behavior

Sebastian Lins, Long H. Nguyen, Guangyu Du, Ali Sunyaev
mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Investigating the Impact of Rewards and Sanctions on Developers’ Proactive AI Accountability Behavior

Sebastian Lins, Long H. Nguyen, Guangyu Du, Ali Sunyaev
article en

Abstract

Accountability of artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems is often addressed reactively, mainly after harm occurs. This study shifts toward proactive approaches, highlighting AI developers’ role in risk mitigation. Proactive AI accountability behavior refers to self-initiated, future-oriented actions that go beyond formal job roles to justify developers’ actions and decisions, and to facilitate the clear attribution of accountability. Drawing on Proactive Motivation Theory, we conducted an online experiment (n = 264) to investigate how governance mechanisms (rewards vs. sanctions) and motivational states impact such behavior. Our results reveal flexible role orientation as the key driver of proactive behavior and how rewards and sanctions impact such a mindset. We contribute by conceptualizing proactive AI accountability behavior and providing a theoretical model that explains its emergence, underscoring the importance of using rewards to foster a proactive mindset alongside sanctions as guardrails against harmful initiatives.

mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.