When the Bad Apps Go Away: The Spillover Effect of Removing Unethical Apps from Rankings on Ethical Apps’ Performance

Unethical behaviors in app markets are rising, making digital service governance and management crucial. Using daily Apple App Store panel data, this study examines how removal from ranking lists (RRL) affects ethical apps. Guided by migration theory, we analyze three mediating effect: punished apps' performance as a push factor, developer update behavior as a pull factor, and users’ expectation gaps as a mooring factor. We employ a pre‑trained BERT model to measure expectation gaps. Results show that RRL weakens punished apps’ performance, serving as a push factor that boosts unpunished apps’ ranking. Reduced update incentives among compliant developers act as a pull factor limiting performance gains. Narrowed user expectation gaps, as a mooring factor, enhance unpunished apps’ performance. Moreover, Higher search volume for unpunished apps strengthens the positive spillover from RRL to their performance via push factor. Our findings offer practical insights for developers and platform regulators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Bad Apps Go Away: The Spillover Effect of Removing Unethical Apps from Rankings on Ethical Apps’ Performance

Keran Duan, Xi Zhang, Ziliang Yang
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

When the Bad Apps Go Away: The Spillover Effect of Removing Unethical Apps from Rankings on Ethical Apps’ Performance

Keran Duan, Xi Zhang, Ziliang Yang
article en

Abstract

Unethical behaviors in app markets are rising, making digital service governance and management crucial. Using daily Apple App Store panel data, this study examines how removal from ranking lists (RRL) affects ethical apps. Guided by migration theory, we analyze three mediating effect: punished apps' performance as a push factor, developer update behavior as a pull factor, and users’ expectation gaps as a mooring factor. We employ a pre‑trained BERT model to measure expectation gaps. Results show that RRL weakens punished apps’ performance, serving as a push factor that boosts unpunished apps’ ranking. Reduced update incentives among compliant developers act as a pull factor limiting performance gains. Narrowed user expectation gaps, as a mooring factor, enhance unpunished apps’ performance. Moreover, Higher search volume for unpunished apps strengthens the positive spillover from RRL to their performance via push factor. Our findings offer practical insights for developers and platform regulators.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.