Mapping the Moral Foundations of Machines: A Vignette-Based Inquiry into Moral Reasoning Across Six Large Language Model Platforms

Large language models take on an ever-increasing role in our societies. In particular, they can guide and inform human decisions. Understanding the moral profiles of LLMs, whether they are stable within the same models over time and across models, is key to ensuring LLM-informed decisions are not unduly shaped by model-specific moral emphases. Drawing from Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), we evaluated the moral profiles of six different LLMs developed in different sociotechnical contexts to measure stability of moral profiles across models. We measured test-retest reliability of LLMs’ explanations of their moral judgments using content analysis to test the stability of output patterns within LLMs. We found mostly stable moral profiles within and across models with few exceptions. We frame these cross-model differences and exceptions as actionable guidance for model selection and routing in morally relevant use cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Moral Foundations of Machines: A Vignette-Based Inquiry into Moral Reasoning Across Six Large Language Model Platforms

Soumyajit De, Lucas Jeay-Bizot, Alan Crawley, Alison Oliver
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Mapping the Moral Foundations of Machines: A Vignette-Based Inquiry into Moral Reasoning Across Six Large Language Model Platforms

Soumyajit De, Lucas Jeay-Bizot, Alan Crawley, Alison Oliver
article en

Abstract

Large language models take on an ever-increasing role in our societies. In particular, they can guide and inform human decisions. Understanding the moral profiles of LLMs, whether they are stable within the same models over time and across models, is key to ensuring LLM-informed decisions are not unduly shaped by model-specific moral emphases. Drawing from Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), we evaluated the moral profiles of six different LLMs developed in different sociotechnical contexts to measure stability of moral profiles across models. We measured test-retest reliability of LLMs’ explanations of their moral judgments using content analysis to test the stability of output patterns within LLMs. We found mostly stable moral profiles within and across models with few exceptions. We frame these cross-model differences and exceptions as actionable guidance for model selection and routing in morally relevant use cases.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.