Is AI Agreement Reassuring? It Depends on What Patients Believe About AI

People often consult online information when choosing a doctor prior to their first visit. As AI increasingly supports medical decision-making, we examined how incorporating an AI agreement cue in a doctor's online profile influences patients’ perceptions of credibility and their intention to visit. In a user study (N = 415), participants reviewed a doctor’s profile indicating 90% diagnostic agreement with either AI decision support systems or human experts. The results show that neither the AI nor the expert agreement cue significantly influences credibility perceptions or visit intention. However, among participants with low or moderate beliefs in the positive machine heuristic, or low beliefs in the negative machine heuristic, the AI agreement cue reduces perceived competence, trustworthiness, and intention to visit. These findings highlight how beliefs about AI shape user responses to the AI agreement cue and offer implications for effective self-presentation strategies for healthcare professionals collaborating with AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is AI Agreement Reassuring? It Depends on What Patients Believe About AI

Yang Cheng, Peixin Hua, Yuan Sun, Cheng Chen
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Is AI Agreement Reassuring? It Depends on What Patients Believe About AI

Yang Cheng, Peixin Hua, Yuan Sun, Cheng Chen
article en

Abstract

People often consult online information when choosing a doctor prior to their first visit. As AI increasingly supports medical decision-making, we examined how incorporating an AI agreement cue in a doctor's online profile influences patients’ perceptions of credibility and their intention to visit. In a user study (N = 415), participants reviewed a doctor’s profile indicating 90% diagnostic agreement with either AI decision support systems or human experts. The results show that neither the AI nor the expert agreement cue significantly influences credibility perceptions or visit intention. However, among participants with low or moderate beliefs in the positive machine heuristic, or low beliefs in the negative machine heuristic, the AI agreement cue reduces perceived competence, trustworthiness, and intention to visit. These findings highlight how beliefs about AI shape user responses to the AI agreement cue and offer implications for effective self-presentation strategies for healthcare professionals collaborating with AI.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is AI Agreement Reassuring? It Depends on What Patients Believe About AI — Yang Cheng, Peixin Hua, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS