Redefining Team Processes in Human-AI Collaboration: A Mixed-Methods Study Across Team Phases

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents introduce new challenges and opportunities across team processes. This study examines the impact of AI on transition, action, and interpersonal phases, and explores team processes central to human-AI collaboration. We surveyed 632 global virtual team members and interviewed nine AI experts. Survey results reveal that AI is seen as most useful during transition phases, less in action, and least in interpersonal phases. Usefulness ratings declined over time across all phases, especially interpersonal, indicating unmet expectations. Experts valued AI in action phases but expressed concerns about losing control during transition phases. Extending an established team processes model, we identify six processes and practices that foster effective human-AI collaboration: AI introduction, expectation management, positive storytelling, change management, navigating role shifts, and social interaction. Our findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to support these processes and manage perceptions of AI in teams.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Team Processes in Human-AI Collaboration: A Mixed-Methods Study Across Team Phases

Peter W. Cardon, Carolin Fleischmann, Emma Graupner
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Redefining Team Processes in Human-AI Collaboration: A Mixed-Methods Study Across Team Phases

Peter W. Cardon, Carolin Fleischmann, Emma Graupner
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents introduce new challenges and opportunities across team processes. This study examines the impact of AI on transition, action, and interpersonal phases, and explores team processes central to human-AI collaboration. We surveyed 632 global virtual team members and interviewed nine AI experts. Survey results reveal that AI is seen as most useful during transition phases, less in action, and least in interpersonal phases. Usefulness ratings declined over time across all phases, especially interpersonal, indicating unmet expectations. Experts valued AI in action phases but expressed concerns about losing control during transition phases. Extending an established team processes model, we identify six processes and practices that foster effective human-AI collaboration: AI introduction, expectation management, positive storytelling, change management, navigating role shifts, and social interaction. Our findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to support these processes and manage perceptions of AI in teams.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining Team Processes in Human-AI Collaboration: A Mixed-Methods Study Across Team Phases — Peter W. Cardon, Carolin Fleischmann, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS