Measurement Equivalence of the System Trustworthiness Scale Across Tasks

The System Trustworthiness Scale (STS) is a recent measure designed to capture trustworthiness perceptions. However, no tests of measurement equivalence (ME) have been conducted despite its importance for scale implementation. Measurement equivalence testing determines if the construct of interest is interpreted the same across groups, which is an important pre-requisite to examining group mean differences. The present work sought to investigate the measurement equivalence of the STS with multigroup confirmatory factor analyses across two different tasks to better understand the impact of context on system trustworthiness. The results provided evidence of ME, demonstrating the interpretability of the STS across contexts, providing additional evidence for the diverse use and interpretability of the STS as a measure of system trustworthiness. The authors implore future research to further examine potential measurement differences to better understand the generalizability of the STS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement Equivalence of the System Trustworthiness Scale Across Tasks

Tyler J. Ryan, Gene M. Alarcon, Scott Meyers, Krista Harris
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Measurement Equivalence of the System Trustworthiness Scale Across Tasks

Tyler J. Ryan, Gene M. Alarcon, Scott Meyers, Krista Harris
article en

Abstract

The System Trustworthiness Scale (STS) is a recent measure designed to capture trustworthiness perceptions. However, no tests of measurement equivalence (ME) have been conducted despite its importance for scale implementation. Measurement equivalence testing determines if the construct of interest is interpreted the same across groups, which is an important pre-requisite to examining group mean differences. The present work sought to investigate the measurement equivalence of the STS with multigroup confirmatory factor analyses across two different tasks to better understand the impact of context on system trustworthiness. The results provided evidence of ME, demonstrating the interpretability of the STS across contexts, providing additional evidence for the diverse use and interpretability of the STS as a measure of system trustworthiness. The authors implore future research to further examine potential measurement differences to better understand the generalizability of the STS.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.