Too Many LLMs to Choose? Design and Trust in Multi-AI Collaboration Systems

Although generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has demonstrated potential in many fields, it still struggles with issues such as limited knowledge and hallucinations. To address these issues, we present a multi-AI collaboration system. Our study takes a multimethod approach, combining design science research (DSR) with quantitative methods. Our aim is to explore the design of effective multi-AI systems and how these affect team trust compared to single-AI setups. We also aim to investigate the differences in users' collaboration experiences between the two models. Our results reveal that multi-AI systems can significantly enhance users' trust in AI, particularly with regard to perceived ability. Users also reported a higher willingness to use multi-AI collaboration and greater satisfaction with it. However, they also noticed more perceived conflict when working with multiple AIs. These findings will help to create more reliable and user-friendly AI collaboration tools, improving the way in which humans and AI can work together effectively.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Too Many LLMs to Choose? Design and Trust in Multi-AI Collaboration Systems

Triparna de Vreede, Ang Zeng, Xusen Cheng
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Too Many LLMs to Choose? Design and Trust in Multi-AI Collaboration Systems

Triparna de Vreede, Ang Zeng, Xusen Cheng
article en

Abstract

Although generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has demonstrated potential in many fields, it still struggles with issues such as limited knowledge and hallucinations. To address these issues, we present a multi-AI collaboration system. Our study takes a multimethod approach, combining design science research (DSR) with quantitative methods. Our aim is to explore the design of effective multi-AI systems and how these affect team trust compared to single-AI setups. We also aim to investigate the differences in users' collaboration experiences between the two models. Our results reveal that multi-AI systems can significantly enhance users' trust in AI, particularly with regard to perceived ability. Users also reported a higher willingness to use multi-AI collaboration and greater satisfaction with it. However, they also noticed more perceived conflict when working with multiple AIs. These findings will help to create more reliable and user-friendly AI collaboration tools, improving the way in which humans and AI can work together effectively.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Too Many LLMs to Choose? Design and Trust in Multi-AI Collaboration Systems — Triparna de Vreede, Ang Zeng, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS