AI Teammates: Silverbacks, Quarterbacks or Knick-Knacks? The Effect of AI Teammates on Humans’ Status Perceptions and Intention to Collaborate

Artificial Intelligence (AI) based teammates are being used by organizations to enhance working teams. Research on the impacts that such AI teammates have on their human coworkers is still developing. This study explores whether and how the formation of human-AI teams (HATs) impacts humans’ intra-group status perceptions and their intention to collaborate with a new AI teammate. We propose that AI teammates will be attributed a status based on high capability and low prosocial behavior perceptions. Further, human incumbents, who perceive their own status to be based on competence and integrity, will exhibit zero-sum beliefs that negatively influence their collaboration intention with the new AI teammate, while prosocial oriented incumbents will rather exhibit increased levels of collaboration intention with the AI teammate. Hypotheses will be tested with data gathered via a 2 by 2 between-subject experiment. We expect to enhance the understanding of human-AI collaboration and the effects of status dynamics within HATs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Teammates: Silverbacks, Quarterbacks or Knick-Knacks? The Effect of AI Teammates on Humans’ Status Perceptions and Intention to Collaborate

Yuting Gao, Georgios Matziou
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Teammates: Silverbacks, Quarterbacks or Knick-Knacks? The Effect of AI Teammates on Humans’ Status Perceptions and Intention to Collaborate

Yuting Gao, Georgios Matziou
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) based teammates are being used by organizations to enhance working teams. Research on the impacts that such AI teammates have on their human coworkers is still developing. This study explores whether and how the formation of human-AI teams (HATs) impacts humans’ intra-group status perceptions and their intention to collaborate with a new AI teammate. We propose that AI teammates will be attributed a status based on high capability and low prosocial behavior perceptions. Further, human incumbents, who perceive their own status to be based on competence and integrity, will exhibit zero-sum beliefs that negatively influence their collaboration intention with the new AI teammate, while prosocial oriented incumbents will rather exhibit increased levels of collaboration intention with the AI teammate. Hypotheses will be tested with data gathered via a 2 by 2 between-subject experiment. We expect to enhance the understanding of human-AI collaboration and the effects of status dynamics within HATs.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.