The Emotional Rift: Evaluating Affective Polarization on TikTok during the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

TikTok has become one of the most popular social media platforms. By focusing on short videos which users can comment on, emotionally charged communication is both encouraged and rewarded. However, it is unclear how affective polarization manifests within the TikTok infra-structure. Drawing on Social Identity Theory to explain intergroup dynamics, this mixed methods study applies a systematic, large-scale corpus analysis to comments (n=10,000) collected from the TikTok accounts @KamalaHarris and @DonaldTrump shortly before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Overall, findings indicate that affective polarization TikTok-specific communication can be sorted into the following categories: 1) (explicit) affective polarization, 2) positive ingroup affirmation, and 3) inferred affective polarization. This study contributes to a toolkit for automated prediction models, offering the base for mitigating negative effects of affective polarization and fostering cohesive engagement on social media.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Emotional Rift: Evaluating Affective Polarization on TikTok during the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

Stefan Stieglitz, Viva Mantz, Melisa Özdemir
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

The Emotional Rift: Evaluating Affective Polarization on TikTok during the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

Stefan Stieglitz, Viva Mantz, Melisa Özdemir
article en

Abstract

TikTok has become one of the most popular social media platforms. By focusing on short videos which users can comment on, emotionally charged communication is both encouraged and rewarded. However, it is unclear how affective polarization manifests within the TikTok infra-structure. Drawing on Social Identity Theory to explain intergroup dynamics, this mixed methods study applies a systematic, large-scale corpus analysis to comments (n=10,000) collected from the TikTok accounts @KamalaHarris and @DonaldTrump shortly before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Overall, findings indicate that affective polarization TikTok-specific communication can be sorted into the following categories: 1) (explicit) affective polarization, 2) positive ingroup affirmation, and 3) inferred affective polarization. This study contributes to a toolkit for automated prediction models, offering the base for mitigating negative effects of affective polarization and fostering cohesive engagement on social media.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.