Five’s a crowd: divergence and delay at the first half of the fifth global plastics treaty negotiation (INC-5.1)

Abstract The United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) convened its fifth session of negotiations (INC-5.1) on a new international legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution from November 25–December 2, 2024, in Busan, South Korea. Initially anticipated to be the final session of negotiations, INC-5.1 concluded without reaching a consensus, highlighting divides among negotiating state parties. A central point of contention remained the divergent priorities of the group of like-minded countries, which advocate for a treaty focused primarily on waste management and the High Ambition Coalition, which calls for a comprehensive lifecycle approach addressing the production, use, and disposal of plastics. This paper examines the barriers and textual changes that defined INC-5.1, drawing on close participant observation and document analysis. Despite progress on financial mechanisms and monitoring frameworks, core obligations, such as limits on production and reduction targets, remain unresolved. Procedural disagreements also hampered the negotiations, with debates over the inclusion of detailed text proposals in the draft treaty further delaying consensus. Looking ahead, negotiations will now extend past 2026, with additional sessions being prepared to reconcile the competing visions for the treaty. This paper highlights the persistent challenges facing the negotiations and considers the implications of the extended timeline on the prospects for an effective global plastics agreement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-025-01066-9
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five’s a crowd: divergence and delay at the first half of the fifth global plastics treaty negotiation (INC-5.1)

Emily Cowan, Hanne Hjelle Hatlebrekke, Rachel Tiller, Thomas Maes et al.
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Five’s a crowd: divergence and delay at the first half of the fifth global plastics treaty negotiation (INC-5.1)

Emily Cowan, Hanne Hjelle Hatlebrekke, Rachel Tiller, Thomas Maes, Julie Grønlund
article en

Abstract

Abstract The United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) convened its fifth session of negotiations (INC-5.1) on a new international legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution from November 25–December 2, 2024, in Busan, South Korea. Initially anticipated to be the final session of negotiations, INC-5.1 concluded without reaching a consensus, highlighting divides among negotiating state parties. A central point of contention remained the divergent priorities of the group of like-minded countries, which advocate for a treaty focused primarily on waste management and the High Ambition Coalition, which calls for a comprehensive lifecycle approach addressing the production, use, and disposal of plastics. This paper examines the barriers and textual changes that defined INC-5.1, drawing on close participant observation and document analysis. Despite progress on financial mechanisms and monitoring frameworks, core obligations, such as limits on production and reduction targets, remain unresolved. Procedural disagreements also hampered the negotiations, with debates over the inclusion of detailed text proposals in the draft treaty further delaying consensus. Looking ahead, negotiations will now extend past 2026, with additional sessions being prepared to reconcile the competing visions for the treaty. This paper highlights the persistent challenges facing the negotiations and considers the implications of the extended timeline on the prospects for an effective global plastics agreement.

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
SINTEF (NO), Grid-Arendal (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.