Lean maturity level: framework proposal and application

Purpose Several models to measure the degree of lean maturity populate academic literature. However, few make the proper connection between the application of lean tools and practices (T/P) and the fundamental objectives of lean manufacturing (LM). This is particularly true of the achievement of continuous flow and production lead time reduction. This article proposes, applies and evaluates a framework for measuring the degree of lean maturity in accordance with such premises. Design/methodology/approach Initially, LM specialists elected the most important lean T/P for the purpose of measuring the degree of maturity. The data were then processed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution technique. Based on these results, a framework was developed and applied to four manufacturing companies, from which degrees of maturity could be calculated and the applicability of the proposed framework evaluated. Findings Of the four companies studied, one presented a low degree of maturity, one an intermediate degree and the other two a high degree. These results proved sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Practical implications The current level of maturity of the manufacturing companies chosen and their strengths and which areas need more attention could be identified from the application of the framework. Originality/value The framework contributes to the field of knowledge by providing a practical and easily applied way of measuring the degree of lean maturity in line with the fundamental objectives of LM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Benchmarking An International Journal
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-04-2023-0239
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lean maturity level: framework proposal and application

Julio Cesar Melo, Airton Kiyoshi Hanashiro, Fernando Bernardi de Souza
1 citations
Benchmarking An International Journal
Quality and Supply Management
2.28
article

Lean maturity level: framework proposal and application

Julio Cesar Melo, Airton Kiyoshi Hanashiro, Fernando Bernardi de Souza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Several models to measure the degree of lean maturity populate academic literature. However, few make the proper connection between the application of lean tools and practices (T/P) and the fundamental objectives of lean manufacturing (LM). This is particularly true of the achievement of continuous flow and production lead time reduction. This article proposes, applies and evaluates a framework for measuring the degree of lean maturity in accordance with such premises. Design/methodology/approach Initially, LM specialists elected the most important lean T/P for the purpose of measuring the degree of maturity. The data were then processed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution technique. Based on these results, a framework was developed and applied to four manufacturing companies, from which degrees of maturity could be calculated and the applicability of the proposed framework evaluated. Findings Of the four companies studied, one presented a low degree of maturity, one an intermediate degree and the other two a high degree. These results proved sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Practical implications The current level of maturity of the manufacturing companies chosen and their strengths and which areas need more attention could be identified from the application of the framework. Originality/value The framework contributes to the field of knowledge by providing a practical and easily applied way of measuring the degree of lean maturity in line with the fundamental objectives of LM.

Benchmarking An International Journal
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Quality and Supply Management
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.