From Dimerization to Signaling: Molecular Dynamics Insights into EphA1 and EphA2 Isoform Specificity

Ephrin receptors (Ephs) are receptor tyrosine kinases that regulate cellular growth, differentiation, and motility. EphA2, often overexpressed in cancer, is notable for its ligand-independent activation, which drives pro-oncogenic signaling distinct from the canonical, ligand-dependent pathway that restricts cell movement. While ligand binding induces extracellular clustering, kinase activation depends on dimerization within the transmembrane (TM) region. EphA1 and EphA2 differ substantially in their function, likely due to differences in their TM, juxtamembrane (JM), and membrane-proximal fibronectin type III (FN1/FN2) domains, but how these regions modulate dimerization remains unresolved. To address this, we performed extensive coarse-grained simulations using Martini 3 in an anionic POPC/PS/PIP <sub>2</sub> membrane. Both receptors formed stable TM dimers, though EphA1 favored a symmetric AXXXGXXXG-centered interface, whereas EphA2 favoured an additional leucine zipper interface and both receptors sampled multiple configurations, reflecting substantial intrinsic variability. Basic residues in the JM region remained membrane-bound, and the EphA2 FN domain displayed sustained PIP <sub>2</sub> interactions, consistent with previous observations. Notably, the FN2 domain alone restricted TM association in both receptors, whereas inclusion of the second FN1 domain restored dimerization but produced receptor-specific extracellular interfaces. These differences arise from distinct FN1-FN2 linker flexibilities and FN-domain membrane contacts, which together shape TM geometry and lipid engagement. Overall, our results highlight how TM and TM-proximal elements cooperatively tune dimerization in Eph receptors, offering mechanistic insight into the divergent activation behaviors of EphA1 and EphA2 and providing testable models relevant to cancer biology and Eph-driven signaling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.23.696317
Primary Topic
Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Dimerization to Signaling: Molecular Dynamics Insights into EphA1 and EphA2 Isoform Specificity

Amita R. Sahoo, Matthias Buck, Nisha Bhattarai
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
article

From Dimerization to Signaling: Molecular Dynamics Insights into EphA1 and EphA2 Isoform Specificity

Amita R. Sahoo, Matthias Buck, Nisha Bhattarai
article en

Abstract

Ephrin receptors (Ephs) are receptor tyrosine kinases that regulate cellular growth, differentiation, and motility. EphA2, often overexpressed in cancer, is notable for its ligand-independent activation, which drives pro-oncogenic signaling distinct from the canonical, ligand-dependent pathway that restricts cell movement. While ligand binding induces extracellular clustering, kinase activation depends on dimerization within the transmembrane (TM) region. EphA1 and EphA2 differ substantially in their function, likely due to differences in their TM, juxtamembrane (JM), and membrane-proximal fibronectin type III (FN1/FN2) domains, but how these regions modulate dimerization remains unresolved. To address this, we performed extensive coarse-grained simulations using Martini 3 in an anionic POPC/PS/PIP <sub>2</sub> membrane. Both receptors formed stable TM dimers, though EphA1 favored a symmetric AXXXGXXXG-centered interface, whereas EphA2 favoured an additional leucine zipper interface and both receptors sampled multiple configurations, reflecting substantial intrinsic variability. Basic residues in the JM region remained membrane-bound, and the EphA2 FN domain displayed sustained PIP <sub>2</sub> interactions, consistent with previous observations. Notably, the FN2 domain alone restricted TM association in both receptors, whereas inclusion of the second FN1 domain restored dimerization but produced receptor-specific extracellular interfaces. These differences arise from distinct FN1-FN2 linker flexibilities and FN-domain membrane contacts, which together shape TM geometry and lipid engagement. Overall, our results highlight how TM and TM-proximal elements cooperatively tune dimerization in Eph receptors, offering mechanistic insight into the divergent activation behaviors of EphA1 and EphA2 and providing testable models relevant to cancer biology and Eph-driven signaling.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Case Western Reserve University, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.