Frequency and spatial limitations of sound field reconstruction methods for navigable reproduction

Sound field reconstruction methods enable the prediction of acoustic field quantities based on a limited number of measurements, including locations where direct measurements are unavailable.Their predictive capabilities over large spatial domains make them a promising tool for navigable reproduction and '6-degrees-of-freedom' applications.Despite their potential, the methods are bandlimited due to spatial sampling, and the predictions can deteriorate far away from the measurement positions.In this study, we quantitatively examine the frequency and spatial limitations of sound field reconstruction methods using psychoacoustic metrics, including binaural auditory models to assess perceived source localisation and spectral colouration.The evaluated reconstruction methods include different wave-based approaches, such as plane waves and point sources.The analysis is conducted using an experimental dataset of spatial room impulse responses, measured sequentially along a line of high spatial resolution in a variable-acoustic room.The findings provide insights into sound field reconstruction techniques for navigable reproduction and the extent to which physical models contribute to practical, navigable auditory experiences.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2025.0411
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency and spatial limitations of sound field reconstruction methods for navigable reproduction

Nils Meyer‐Kahlen, Tapio Lokki, Efrén Fernández-Grande, S. Verburg et al.
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Frequency and spatial limitations of sound field reconstruction methods for navigable reproduction

Nils Meyer‐Kahlen, Tapio Lokki, Efrén Fernández-Grande, S. Verburg, Antonio Figueroa-Duran
article en

Abstract

Sound field reconstruction methods enable the prediction of acoustic field quantities based on a limited number of measurements, including locations where direct measurements are unavailable.Their predictive capabilities over large spatial domains make them a promising tool for navigable reproduction and '6-degrees-of-freedom' applications.Despite their potential, the methods are bandlimited due to spatial sampling, and the predictions can deteriorate far away from the measurement positions.In this study, we quantitatively examine the frequency and spatial limitations of sound field reconstruction methods using psychoacoustic metrics, including binaural auditory models to assess perceived source localisation and spectral colouration.The evaluated reconstruction methods include different wave-based approaches, such as plane waves and point sources.The analysis is conducted using an experimental dataset of spatial room impulse responses, measured sequentially along a line of high spatial resolution in a variable-acoustic room.The findings provide insights into sound field reconstruction techniques for navigable reproduction and the extent to which physical models contribute to practical, navigable auditory experiences.

Villum Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.