Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Differential Diagnosis of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Using Routine Preoperative Clinical and Laboratory Data

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip (coxarthrosis) and knee (gonarthrosis) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Differential diagnosis typically relies on imaging modalities such as X-rays and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). However, advanced imaging can be expensive and inaccessible, highlighting the need for non-invasive diagnostic tools. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model to distinguish between hip and knee osteoarthritis using standard preoperative clinical and laboratory data. This model is designed to assist physicians in prioritizing whether to order a hip or a knee X-ray first, thereby saving time and medical resources. The study utilized retrospective data from 1792 patients treated at the City Clinical Hospital in Almaty, Kazakhstan. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, five machine learning algorithms were used for training and evaluation: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and CatBoost. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to interpret predictions and determine the contribution of each feature. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 93.85%, a precision of 95.15%, a recall of 90.51%, and an F1-score of 92.41%. SHAP analysis revealed that age, glucose and leukocyte levels, urea, and BMI made the greatest contributions to the model’s predictions, while local analysis using LIME indicated that age, leukocyte levels, glucose, erythrocytes, and platelets were the most influential features. These findings support the use of machine learning for cost-effective early osteoarthritis triage using routine preoperative data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a19010024
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Differential Diagnosis of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Using Routine Preoperative Clinical and Laboratory Data

Naoya Maeda-Nishino, Nurdaulet Tasmurzayev, Zhanel Baigarayeva, Bibars Amangeldy et al.
Algorithms
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Differential Diagnosis of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Using Routine Preoperative Clinical and Laboratory Data

Naoya Maeda-Nishino, Nurdaulet Tasmurzayev, Zhanel Baigarayeva, Bibars Amangeldy, Кassymbek Ozhikenov, Roza Beisembekova, Baglan Imanbek, Daulet Baimbetov, Assiya Boltaboyeva
article en

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip (coxarthrosis) and knee (gonarthrosis) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Differential diagnosis typically relies on imaging modalities such as X-rays and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). However, advanced imaging can be expensive and inaccessible, highlighting the need for non-invasive diagnostic tools. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model to distinguish between hip and knee osteoarthritis using standard preoperative clinical and laboratory data. This model is designed to assist physicians in prioritizing whether to order a hip or a knee X-ray first, thereby saving time and medical resources. The study utilized retrospective data from 1792 patients treated at the City Clinical Hospital in Almaty, Kazakhstan. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, five machine learning algorithms were used for training and evaluation: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and CatBoost. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to interpret predictions and determine the contribution of each feature. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 93.85%, a precision of 95.15%, a recall of 90.51%, and an F1-score of 92.41%. SHAP analysis revealed that age, glucose and leukocyte levels, urea, and BMI made the greatest contributions to the model’s predictions, while local analysis using LIME indicated that age, leukocyte levels, glucose, erythrocytes, and platelets were the most influential features. These findings support the use of machine learning for cost-effective early osteoarthritis triage using routine preoperative data.

AlgorithmsVol. 19(1)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Satbayev University (KZ), Kishokai Medical Corporation (JP), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.