Inequities in dementia risk and recommandations for inequity stratifiers collection in research

Certain communities, including ethnic and cultural minorities, experience disproportionately higher rates of dementia and worse outcomes.<sup>1,2</sup> Structural and social determinants of health (SSDH)-the conditions in which people are born, live, work, and age<sup>3</sup>-are likely key drivers of these disparities.<sup>4</sup> The effects of SSDH accumulate over the lifecourse, influencing physical, mental, and brain health, as well as the ability to adopt healthy behaviors.<sup>4</sup> Despite growing recognition of their role in dementia inequities, SSDH remain inconsistently integrated into research, and Canada lacks specific guidelines for their inclusion in dementia studies. This project seeks to provide clear guidance for integrating SSDH into aging and dementia research in Canada. In collaboration with a network of stakeholders and knowledge users, we are developing a recommendation framework grounded in community and expert input. To ensure a comprehensive approach, we are 1) Engaging community partners (e.g., individuals with lived experience, advocates for marginalized communities) through mind mapping sessions to identify the factors they view as most critical to maintaining brain health in aging. 2) Conducting a Delphi survey that invites both field experts and community partners to prioritize key SSDH indicators. 3) Reviewing current practices for assessing SSDH in Canadian longitudinal studies on dementia and aging through a scoping review, the findings of which will further inform the recommendations. The resulting guidance framework will be shared as an online toolkit to facilitate its adoption and promote harmonization across Canadian cohorts. To support implementation, workshops and webinars will be organized to help researchers integrate SSDH into all stages of their work, from data collection to analysis and interpretation. Adopting a harmonized SSDH battery across Canadian cohorts will enable the generation of large, pooled datasets, allowing for robust investigations of SSDH variables and their interactions. Although this initiative is tailored to the Canadian context, we hope it can serve as a model for other countries and be adapted to address dementia-related inequities worldwide. References 1. Lee et al. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5. 2. Mukadam et al. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2011;26. 3. Gómez et al. JPHMP. 2021;27. 4. Adkins-Jackson et al. A&D. 2023;19.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70858_106045
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequities in dementia risk and recommandations for inequity stratifiers collection in research

Martin Guhn, Stefanie A Tremblay, Maiya R. Geddes, Laurence J. Kirmayer et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Inequities in dementia risk and recommandations for inequity stratifiers collection in research

Martin Guhn, Stefanie A Tremblay, Maiya R. Geddes, Laurence J. Kirmayer, Nancy E. Mayo, Juhi Tulsi, Vasvi Dhir, Isabel McDonald
article en

Abstract

Certain communities, including ethnic and cultural minorities, experience disproportionately higher rates of dementia and worse outcomes.<sup>1,2</sup> Structural and social determinants of health (SSDH)-the conditions in which people are born, live, work, and age<sup>3</sup>-are likely key drivers of these disparities.<sup>4</sup> The effects of SSDH accumulate over the lifecourse, influencing physical, mental, and brain health, as well as the ability to adopt healthy behaviors.<sup>4</sup> Despite growing recognition of their role in dementia inequities, SSDH remain inconsistently integrated into research, and Canada lacks specific guidelines for their inclusion in dementia studies. This project seeks to provide clear guidance for integrating SSDH into aging and dementia research in Canada. In collaboration with a network of stakeholders and knowledge users, we are developing a recommendation framework grounded in community and expert input. To ensure a comprehensive approach, we are 1) Engaging community partners (e.g., individuals with lived experience, advocates for marginalized communities) through mind mapping sessions to identify the factors they view as most critical to maintaining brain health in aging. 2) Conducting a Delphi survey that invites both field experts and community partners to prioritize key SSDH indicators. 3) Reviewing current practices for assessing SSDH in Canadian longitudinal studies on dementia and aging through a scoping review, the findings of which will further inform the recommendations. The resulting guidance framework will be shared as an online toolkit to facilitate its adoption and promote harmonization across Canadian cohorts. To support implementation, workshops and webinars will be organized to help researchers integrate SSDH into all stages of their work, from data collection to analysis and interpretation. Adopting a harmonized SSDH battery across Canadian cohorts will enable the generation of large, pooled datasets, allowing for robust investigations of SSDH variables and their interactions. Although this initiative is tailored to the Canadian context, we hope it can serve as a model for other countries and be adapted to address dementia-related inequities worldwide. References 1. Lee et al. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5. 2. Mukadam et al. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2011;26. 3. Gómez et al. JPHMP. 2021;27. 4. Adkins-Jackson et al. A&D. 2023;19.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S4)
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), NeuroRx Research (Canada) (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.