Information and authority in multidivisional organizations

Abstract This article investigates the role of different kinds of information in the allocation of decision authority. In a multidivisional organization, divisions have access to common- or private-interest pieces of information, which can be shared via cheap talk communication. While common-interest information aligns incentives and is always beneficial from the headquarters’ perspective, private-interest information not only creates a bias in communication but also can act as noise when garbled with common-interest information. Hence, private-interest information can be detrimental from the headquarters’ perspective. As a consequence, when the headquarters selects the decision-maker, the allocation of authority not only depends on the payoff relevance of the divisions, but also on the details of the available information (JEL D83, D82).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaf021
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information and authority in multidivisional organizations

Inga Deimen
The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Game Theory and Applications
article

Information and authority in multidivisional organizations

Inga Deimen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the role of different kinds of information in the allocation of decision authority. In a multidivisional organization, divisions have access to common- or private-interest pieces of information, which can be shared via cheap talk communication. While common-interest information aligns incentives and is always beneficial from the headquarters’ perspective, private-interest information not only creates a bias in communication but also can act as noise when garbled with common-interest information. Hence, private-interest information can be detrimental from the headquarters’ perspective. As a consequence, when the headquarters selects the decision-maker, the allocation of authority not only depends on the payoff relevance of the divisions, but also on the details of the available information (JEL D83, D82).

The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Center for Economic and Policy Research (US), University of Arizona (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.