Middle and High School Teachers’ Perceived Expertise and Needs in Disciplinary Literacy

For years, secondary educators have been tasked with incorporating literacy into their instruction, supported by training and courses; however, these may not fully meet the specific needs of teachers. Despite their existing expertise, teachers are often taught general literacy strategies, which leaves gaps in targeted and ongoing professional learning because their needs were not included in the co-design process. This study aimed to recognize teachers’ perceived expertise, challenge misconceptions that subject-area teachers do not incorporate literacy practices, and inform professional learning through teachers’ experiences and perspectives. Therefore, we surveyed 165 middle and high school teachers across eight subject areas to assess their knowledge and self-efficacy in disciplinary literacy. Our results extend existing research that highlights the expertise of subject-area teachers, while also building on scholarship that emphasizes the need for the literacy scholar’s expertise to be combined with others’ perspectives and expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AERA Open
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251400255
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Middle and High School Teachers’ Perceived Expertise and Needs in Disciplinary Literacy

Charlene Aldrich, Rachelle S. Savitz, Christy Brown, Jennifer D. Morrison et al.
AERA Open
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Middle and High School Teachers’ Perceived Expertise and Needs in Disciplinary Literacy

Charlene Aldrich, Rachelle S. Savitz, Christy Brown, Jennifer D. Morrison, Britnie Delinger Kane, W. Ian O’Byrne
article en

Abstract

For years, secondary educators have been tasked with incorporating literacy into their instruction, supported by training and courses; however, these may not fully meet the specific needs of teachers. Despite their existing expertise, teachers are often taught general literacy strategies, which leaves gaps in targeted and ongoing professional learning because their needs were not included in the co-design process. This study aimed to recognize teachers’ perceived expertise, challenge misconceptions that subject-area teachers do not incorporate literacy practices, and inform professional learning through teachers’ experiences and perspectives. Therefore, we surveyed 165 middle and high school teachers across eight subject areas to assess their knowledge and self-efficacy in disciplinary literacy. Our results extend existing research that highlights the expertise of subject-area teachers, while also building on scholarship that emphasizes the need for the literacy scholar’s expertise to be combined with others’ perspectives and expertise.

AERA OpenVol. 11
East Carolina University (US), Sam Houston State University (US), College of Charleston (US), Clemson University (US), Citadel (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Middle and High School Teachers’ Perceived Expertise and Needs in Disciplinary Literacy — Charlene Aldrich, Rachelle S. Savitz, et al. · AERA Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS