Estimation of Soil Water Flux Using the Heat Pulse Technique and Vector Addition in Saturated Soils of Different Textures

Soil water flux is a key parameter for understanding water and heat transport processes in the vadose zone. The heat pulse technique (HPT) has shown considerable potential for predicting soil water flux. Traditional three-needle probe methods, the maximum dimensionless temperature difference (MDTD) method and the ratio of downstream to upstream temperature increases (Ratio) method, can only measure water flux along the probe alignment. To enhance the applicability of the HPT method, the five-needle probe with vector addition allows for the measurement of soil water flux in any direction within the plane perpendicular to the needles. However, its applicability across different soil textures remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the MDTD and Ratio methods when combined with vector addition across different soil textures. Experimental results show that the vector MDTD and Ratio methods improve water flux measurement accuracy compared with traditional three-needle methods, confirming the reliability of the vector HPT approach. Specifically, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the vector MDTD method decreased by 1.69%, 1.04%, and 1.80% in sand, sandy loam, and silt loam, respectively, compared with the traditional MDTD method. In contrast, the MAPE of the vector Ratio method varied by +8.83%, −6.73%, and −18.20% in the same soils, relative to the traditional Ratio method. Examining the root mean square error (RMSE) of each method yields a similar conclusion. Similarly to traditional HPT methods, the measurement accuracy of the vector HPT approach is influenced by soil texture, water flux range, and probe spacing. Notably, because the vector HPT method involves four probe spacings, namely the distances between the heating needle and the temperature-sensing needles, it can exacerbate the instability of the resultant water flux measurements. These findings may facilitate the broader application of the HPT method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18010067
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of Soil Water Flux Using the Heat Pulse Technique and Vector Addition in Saturated Soils of Different Textures

Ya‐Yun Wu, Qinghua Pan, Dongye Lu, Zhi Zhao et al.
Water
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Estimation of Soil Water Flux Using the Heat Pulse Technique and Vector Addition in Saturated Soils of Different Textures

Ya‐Yun Wu, Qinghua Pan, Dongye Lu, Zhi Zhao, Fuyun Lu, Yuping Zhang
article en

Abstract

Soil water flux is a key parameter for understanding water and heat transport processes in the vadose zone. The heat pulse technique (HPT) has shown considerable potential for predicting soil water flux. Traditional three-needle probe methods, the maximum dimensionless temperature difference (MDTD) method and the ratio of downstream to upstream temperature increases (Ratio) method, can only measure water flux along the probe alignment. To enhance the applicability of the HPT method, the five-needle probe with vector addition allows for the measurement of soil water flux in any direction within the plane perpendicular to the needles. However, its applicability across different soil textures remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the MDTD and Ratio methods when combined with vector addition across different soil textures. Experimental results show that the vector MDTD and Ratio methods improve water flux measurement accuracy compared with traditional three-needle methods, confirming the reliability of the vector HPT approach. Specifically, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the vector MDTD method decreased by 1.69%, 1.04%, and 1.80% in sand, sandy loam, and silt loam, respectively, compared with the traditional MDTD method. In contrast, the MAPE of the vector Ratio method varied by +8.83%, −6.73%, and −18.20% in the same soils, relative to the traditional Ratio method. Examining the root mean square error (RMSE) of each method yields a similar conclusion. Similarly to traditional HPT methods, the measurement accuracy of the vector HPT approach is influenced by soil texture, water flux range, and probe spacing. Notably, because the vector HPT method involves four probe spacings, namely the distances between the heating needle and the temperature-sensing needles, it can exacerbate the instability of the resultant water flux measurements. These findings may facilitate the broader application of the HPT method.

WaterVol. 18(1)
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.