Assessment of the reporting of harms in systematic reviews focused on hallucinogens: A cross-sectional study

Harms were largely underreported in scientific literature regarding hallucinogen use, despite many studies designating them as a primary or secondary outcome. Inadequate reporting is unlikely to provide credible evidence used to evaluate the benefit-harm trade-off. Therefore, steps should be taken to improve the reporting of harms in studies concerning hallucinogen use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251399554
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the reporting of harms in systematic reviews focused on hallucinogens: A cross-sectional study

Jason Beaman, Morgan Garrett, Brayden Rucker, Kaylin Ray et al.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Assessment of the reporting of harms in systematic reviews focused on hallucinogens: A cross-sectional study

Jason Beaman, Morgan Garrett, Brayden Rucker, Kaylin Ray, Holly Flores, Audrey Wise, Micah Kee, Ryan Newhardt, Kaylyn Jade Rowsey, Matt Vassar, Lauren Kramer
article en

Abstract

Harms were largely underreported in scientific literature regarding hallucinogen use, despite many studies designating them as a primary or secondary outcome. Inadequate reporting is unlikely to provide credible evidence used to evaluate the benefit-harm trade-off. Therefore, steps should be taken to improve the reporting of harms in studies concerning hallucinogen use.

Journal of Psychopharmacology
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.