Comparison of Vertical Marginal Fitness of Zirconia Overlay Fabricated Using Conventional and Two Digital Impression Technology: An In Vitro Study

Introduction: We aimed to compare the vertical marginal fitness measurement of indirect zirconia overlay restorations fabricated using conventional and two types of digital impression technologies. Methods: Thirty sound upper first premolar teeth were divided into three main groups ( n = 10) according to the type of impression method: group A impressions were taken using addition silicone; group B digital impressions were obtained using the Medit i700 digital scanner; and group C impressions were taken using Primescan scanner. After the indirect restorations were completed, the marginal fitness was assessed using a digital microscope at 200× and the Image J program, both before and after cementation. Results: There were statistically significant differences in vertical marginal fitness among the different impression methods ( P < 0.001) and before and after cementation ( P < 0.001). Nonsignificant differences were found among different tooth surfaces. Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference among the three impression methods ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The marginal gap instead of marginal fitness of indirect restorations fabricated using digital impressions was smaller than that of restorations fabricated using conventional impressions. The marginal fitness for overlays fabricated using the Primescan scanner was lower than that of overlays fabricated using the Medit i700 intraoral scanner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental Hypotheses
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_93_23
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Vertical Marginal Fitness of Zirconia Overlay Fabricated Using Conventional and Two Digital Impression Technology: An In Vitro Study

Hala Mohammed Hussein, Mohammed Kassim Gholam
Dental Hypotheses
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparison of Vertical Marginal Fitness of Zirconia Overlay Fabricated Using Conventional and Two Digital Impression Technology: An In Vitro Study

Hala Mohammed Hussein, Mohammed Kassim Gholam
article en

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to compare the vertical marginal fitness measurement of indirect zirconia overlay restorations fabricated using conventional and two types of digital impression technologies. Methods: Thirty sound upper first premolar teeth were divided into three main groups ( n = 10) according to the type of impression method: group A impressions were taken using addition silicone; group B digital impressions were obtained using the Medit i700 digital scanner; and group C impressions were taken using Primescan scanner. After the indirect restorations were completed, the marginal fitness was assessed using a digital microscope at 200× and the Image J program, both before and after cementation. Results: There were statistically significant differences in vertical marginal fitness among the different impression methods ( P < 0.001) and before and after cementation ( P < 0.001). Nonsignificant differences were found among different tooth surfaces. Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference among the three impression methods ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The marginal gap instead of marginal fitness of indirect restorations fabricated using digital impressions was smaller than that of restorations fabricated using conventional impressions. The marginal fitness for overlays fabricated using the Primescan scanner was lower than that of overlays fabricated using the Medit i700 intraoral scanner.

Dental HypothesesVol. 16(4)
Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.