COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MERGING OF KNOWLEDGE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN FIGHTING POVERTY: INSIGHTS FROM TANZANIA

One significant challenge in developing effective strategies to fight poverty is understanding the methodologies and knowledge required for such efforts. This study compares the merging of knowledge research methodology with traditional and participatory approaches in co-creating knowledge. It begins by contrasting traditional and participatory methods, then examines how the merging of knowledge differs from other participatory methodologies. A key focus is on employing a methodology that enhances engagement among individuals with lived experience of poverty, academics, and practitioners within and beyond the research context. This engagement is essential for co-creating scientific knowledge that can liberate those living in poverty. The study found that while all research approaches exhibit varying degrees of participation, the merging of knowledge stands out as a distinctive approach. It promotes empowerment, achieves sustainable transformative effects, challenges power imbalances, fosters inclusivity, and enhances participant engagement in knowledge co-creation. This is particularly significant for individuals living in poverty. The findings align with Wresinski’s assertion that research on poverty must involve those living in poverty; otherwise, it ‘enslaves them’ and remains ‘lifeless’. The study concludes that employing a merging of knowledge methodology enriches the knowledge base and empowers those affected by poverty. By prioritizing diverse voices, regardless of their societal power, this approach fosters a more inclusive and effective research environment. Therefore, this study advocates for the adoption of a merging of knowledge approach to address the limitations of traditional and participatory approaches to poverty research