Bridging global guidance and national practice in digital health: A comparative qualitative document analysis of WHO (2020-2025) and Türkiye (2024-2028)<sup></sup>

This study aims to assess the alignment and divergence between the WHO’s global digital health strategy and Türkiye’s Ministry of Health's Strategic Plan 2024–2028, identifying strengths, gaps, and policy implications. A comparative qualitative document analysis was conducted using the official strategy documents of the WHO and Türkiye. Evidence was coded under SO1–SO4 and the CCME framework and interpreted through policy transfer, institutional isomorphism, multiple streams, network governance, and learning health systems. Türkiye shows strong alignment in SO2 (national implementation), with eNabız, MHRS, and SİZDES reflecting national ownership and monitoring. Partial alignment exists between SO3 (governance) and SO4 (people-centred systems), with multi-stakeholder participation, equity indicators, digital literacy, and ethical AI remaining limited. SO1 (global collaboration) is weakest, with little emphasis on digital public goods or open standards. While Türkiye’s KPI-driven monitoring is advanced, integration of the WHO’s learning-oriented CCME cycle is limited. Türkiye’s digital health strategy demonstrates strong national capacity but weaker global alignment. Greater engagement in WHO/ISO networks, the adoption of equity-focused indicators, and the implementation of continuous improvement mechanisms are needed to bridge national innovation with global governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business And Management Studies An International Journal
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v13i4.2666
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging global guidance and national practice in digital health: A comparative qualitative document analysis of WHO (2020-2025) and Türkiye (2024-2028)

İbrahim H. Kayral
Business And Management Studies An International Journal
Global Health and Surgery
article

Bridging global guidance and national practice in digital health: A comparative qualitative document analysis of WHO (2020-2025) and Türkiye (2024-2028)

İbrahim H. Kayral
article en

Abstract

This study aims to assess the alignment and divergence between the WHO’s global digital health strategy and Türkiye’s Ministry of Health's Strategic Plan 2024–2028, identifying strengths, gaps, and policy implications. A comparative qualitative document analysis was conducted using the official strategy documents of the WHO and Türkiye. Evidence was coded under SO1–SO4 and the CCME framework and interpreted through policy transfer, institutional isomorphism, multiple streams, network governance, and learning health systems. Türkiye shows strong alignment in SO2 (national implementation), with eNabız, MHRS, and SİZDES reflecting national ownership and monitoring. Partial alignment exists between SO3 (governance) and SO4 (people-centred systems), with multi-stakeholder participation, equity indicators, digital literacy, and ethical AI remaining limited. SO1 (global collaboration) is weakest, with little emphasis on digital public goods or open standards. While Türkiye’s KPI-driven monitoring is advanced, integration of the WHO’s learning-oriented CCME cycle is limited. Türkiye’s digital health strategy demonstrates strong national capacity but weaker global alignment. Greater engagement in WHO/ISO networks, the adoption of equity-focused indicators, and the implementation of continuous improvement mechanisms are needed to bridge national innovation with global governance.

Business And Management Studies An International JournalVol. 13(4)
Izmir University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.