Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Abstract Contemporary egalitarian theory has been shaped by a debate between distributive and relational perspectives. Relational egalitarians argue that equality is primarily about the character of our social and political relationships, rather than the pattern of distribution of goods. But they often also claim that distributive and relational ideals are connected in practice, because material inequality impairs our ability to stand as social and political equals. Using a survey experiment, we assess the impact of material inequality on relational equality. We show that priming income inequality increases perceptions of unequal social status; but it does not affect perceived equal political standing, or the extent to which respondents affirm the ideal of relational equality. We argue that this empirical approach yields deeper payoffs for conceptual and normative questions about relational equality; and it contributes to wider methodological debates about the role of survey data in normative political theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-025-10512-0
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Lucy Barnes, Alice Baderin, Lindsay Richards
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Lucy Barnes, Alice Baderin, Lindsay Richards
article en

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary egalitarian theory has been shaped by a debate between distributive and relational perspectives. Relational egalitarians argue that equality is primarily about the character of our social and political relationships, rather than the pattern of distribution of goods. But they often also claim that distributive and relational ideals are connected in practice, because material inequality impairs our ability to stand as social and political equals. Using a survey experiment, we assess the impact of material inequality on relational equality. We show that priming income inequality increases perceptions of unequal social status; but it does not affect perceived equal political standing, or the extent to which respondents affirm the ideal of relational equality. We argue that this empirical approach yields deeper payoffs for conceptual and normative questions about relational equality; and it contributes to wider methodological debates about the role of survey data in normative political theory.

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), University College London (GB), University of Reading (GB)
McGill University, UK Research and Innovation, University of Reading, Universität Konstanz
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment — Lucy Barnes, Alice Baderin, et al. · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS