Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal‐onset seizures: A single‐center, ambispective, open‐label, real‐world observational study

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of PER and LEV as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), in which 70 patients receiving PER monotherapy and 77 patients receiving LEV monotherapy were enrolled. Compared with LEV, PER had significantly higher seizure-freedom rates (SFRs) at 6 and 12 months and a non-significant trend of higher SFR at 24 months. The two treatments had comparable retention rates. Chinese patients with FOS receiving PER monotherapy were more likely to achieve seizure freedom and had a higher incidence of dizziness than LEV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia Open
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70147
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal‐onset seizures: A single‐center, ambispective, open‐label, real‐world observational study

Qigang Zhou, Yan Zhang, Haitao Zhu, Haiyan Ma et al.
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal‐onset seizures: A single‐center, ambispective, open‐label, real‐world observational study

Qigang Zhou, Yan Zhang, Haitao Zhu, Haiyan Ma, Honghao Xu, Lu Yang, Xuefeng Qu, Jiajia Li, Rui Zhang, Yiqing Yang
article en

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of PER and LEV as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), in which 70 patients receiving PER monotherapy and 77 patients receiving LEV monotherapy were enrolled. Compared with LEV, PER had significantly higher seizure-freedom rates (SFRs) at 6 and 12 months and a non-significant trend of higher SFR at 24 months. The two treatments had comparable retention rates. Chinese patients with FOS receiving PER monotherapy were more likely to achieve seizure freedom and had a higher incidence of dizziness than LEV.

Epilepsia OpenVol. 11(1)
Nanjing Brain Hospital (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal‐onset seizures: A single‐center, ambispective, open‐label, real‐world observational study — Qigang Zhou, Yan Zhang, et al. · Epilepsia Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS