Decoding neural emotion patterns through large language model embeddings

Understanding how emotional expression in language relates to brain function remains a key challenge in neuroscience. Traditional neuroimaging provides valuable insight but is costly and limited to controlled laboratory settings. Here, we present a computational framework that explores potential links between emotional content in natural language and neuro-anatomical regions associated with affective processing. This, when validated through complementary neuroimaging, may enable scalable, imaging-free investigation of emotion-brain relationships. Our approach combines text embeddings, dimensionality reduction, and clustering to identify emotional states, which are then mapped to relevant brain regions. The framework was evaluated across three applications: (i) comparing healthy and depressed individuals, (ii) analyzing a large-scale emotion dataset, and (iii) contrasting human and large language model (LLM) outputs. Emotion intensity was quantified using a lexical scoring system sensitive to keywords, syntax, and modifiers, producing computationally plausible emotion-to-region clusters with visualization mapping. Across experiments, the framework distinguished healthy from depressed participants through distinct computational activation patterns and revealed systematic differences between human and LLM-generated texts in predicted computational engagement. A key finding emerged: depressed individuals exhibited reduced emotional diversity, showing 2.2 - 2.7 times more homogeneous emotional expression than healthy controls, suggesting that emotional rigidity may serve as a computational marker of depression. These computational patterns represent testable hypotheses, requiring further validation through neuroimaging. This work establishes a scalable, cost-effective tool for advancing both clinical and computational models of emotion, and provides a neuro-inspired benchmark for assessing how closely AI-generated language mirrors human emotional expression. • This study introduces a computational framework for mapping language emotion to brain regions without requiring neuroimaging. • The integration of embeddings and neuro-anatomical mapping differentiates through distinct activation patterns. • The framework demonstrates high spatial specificity by mapping discrete emotions to neuro-anatomically plausible regions. • Predicted regional assignment are derived from established neuroimaging coordinates requiring further independent validation. • In favor of reproducible research and to advance the field, all code used in this study is made publicly available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocomputing
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.132513
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding neural emotion patterns through large language model embeddings

Liza van Eijk, Gideon Vos, Maryam Ebrahimpour, Zoltan Sarnyai et al.
Neurocomputing
Mental Health via Writing
article

Decoding neural emotion patterns through large language model embeddings

Liza van Eijk, Gideon Vos, Maryam Ebrahimpour, Zoltan Sarnyai, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi
article en

Abstract

Understanding how emotional expression in language relates to brain function remains a key challenge in neuroscience. Traditional neuroimaging provides valuable insight but is costly and limited to controlled laboratory settings. Here, we present a computational framework that explores potential links between emotional content in natural language and neuro-anatomical regions associated with affective processing. This, when validated through complementary neuroimaging, may enable scalable, imaging-free investigation of emotion-brain relationships. Our approach combines text embeddings, dimensionality reduction, and clustering to identify emotional states, which are then mapped to relevant brain regions. The framework was evaluated across three applications: (i) comparing healthy and depressed individuals, (ii) analyzing a large-scale emotion dataset, and (iii) contrasting human and large language model (LLM) outputs. Emotion intensity was quantified using a lexical scoring system sensitive to keywords, syntax, and modifiers, producing computationally plausible emotion-to-region clusters with visualization mapping. Across experiments, the framework distinguished healthy from depressed participants through distinct computational activation patterns and revealed systematic differences between human and LLM-generated texts in predicted computational engagement. A key finding emerged: depressed individuals exhibited reduced emotional diversity, showing 2.2 - 2.7 times more homogeneous emotional expression than healthy controls, suggesting that emotional rigidity may serve as a computational marker of depression. These computational patterns represent testable hypotheses, requiring further validation through neuroimaging. This work establishes a scalable, cost-effective tool for advancing both clinical and computational models of emotion, and provides a neuro-inspired benchmark for assessing how closely AI-generated language mirrors human emotional expression. • This study introduces a computational framework for mapping language emotion to brain regions without requiring neuroimaging. • The integration of embeddings and neuro-anatomical mapping differentiates through distinct activation patterns. • The framework demonstrates high spatial specificity by mapping discrete emotions to neuro-anatomically plausible regions. • Predicted regional assignment are derived from established neuroimaging coordinates requiring further independent validation. • In favor of reproducible research and to advance the field, all code used in this study is made publicly available.

NeurocomputingVol. 669
James Cook University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.