Organization Theory and Ontological Claims: Working out tensions in CCO scholarship and organization studies

What distinguishes organizations from other social collectives is a recurring question in organization theory. This article engages with the notion of “organizationality” as a recent proposition stemming from CCO (communicative constitution of organization) scholarship to address this question. We argue that by claiming to synthesize a number of insights worked out in organization studies over the last decades, what we call the “theory of organizationality” commits to a number of unproblematized ontological assumptions, which may be shared well outside its CCO source. Questioning those assumptions may, therefore, be useful to help organizational scholarship as a whole to grow on more solid theoretical grounds, making our ideas clearer not only about what it is we study but also how to relate among our various approaches and with other fields of social inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Theory
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877251404484
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organization Theory and Ontological Claims: Working out tensions in CCO scholarship and organization studies

Frédéric Dion, François Cooren, Jacinthe Dupuis
Organization Theory
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Organization Theory and Ontological Claims: Working out tensions in CCO scholarship and organization studies

Frédéric Dion, François Cooren, Jacinthe Dupuis
article en

Abstract

What distinguishes organizations from other social collectives is a recurring question in organization theory. This article engages with the notion of “organizationality” as a recent proposition stemming from CCO (communicative constitution of organization) scholarship to address this question. We argue that by claiming to synthesize a number of insights worked out in organization studies over the last decades, what we call the “theory of organizationality” commits to a number of unproblematized ontological assumptions, which may be shared well outside its CCO source. Questioning those assumptions may, therefore, be useful to help organizational scholarship as a whole to grow on more solid theoretical grounds, making our ideas clearer not only about what it is we study but also how to relate among our various approaches and with other fields of social inquiry.

Organization TheoryVol. 6(4)
Université de Montréal (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Organization Theory and Ontological Claims: Working out tensions in CCO scholarship and organization studies — Frédéric Dion, François Cooren, et al. · Organization Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS