Impact of Stent-Graft Complexity on Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review revealed no significant difference in mortality, complications, or reintervention between renal FEVAR and complex FEVAR. Renal FEVAR in juxtarenal aneurysms remains a safe and effective treatment option with no higher risk on type Ia endoleak or reinterventions during follow-up compared with complex FEVAR. The current data do not provide a clear understanding of the long-term benefits associated with complex FEVAR compared with renal FEVAR.Clinical ImpactThis systematic review found no significant differences in mortality, complications, or reinterventions between renal and complex FEVAR. The results indicate that renal FEVAR remains an effective option for appropriately selected patients, and that the added complexity of incorporating mesenteric vessels does not necessarily translate into improved outcomes. Current evidence does not clarify whether complex FEVAR provides long-term advantages over renal FEVAR. These findings underscore the importance of anatomy-driven, individualized decision-making in complex aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251397841
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Stent-Graft Complexity on Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marion JLF Heymans, Ozan Yazar, Chrissy van Wely, Buland Tiwana et al.
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Impact of Stent-Graft Complexity on Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marion JLF Heymans, Ozan Yazar, Chrissy van Wely, Buland Tiwana, Geert Willem H. Schurink, Jean H. T. Daemen, Barend M. E. Mees, Oguzhan Bayrak
article en

Abstract

This systematic review revealed no significant difference in mortality, complications, or reintervention between renal FEVAR and complex FEVAR. Renal FEVAR in juxtarenal aneurysms remains a safe and effective treatment option with no higher risk on type Ia endoleak or reinterventions during follow-up compared with complex FEVAR. The current data do not provide a clear understanding of the long-term benefits associated with complex FEVAR compared with renal FEVAR.Clinical ImpactThis systematic review found no significant differences in mortality, complications, or reinterventions between renal and complex FEVAR. The results indicate that renal FEVAR remains an effective option for appropriately selected patients, and that the added complexity of incorporating mesenteric vessels does not necessarily translate into improved outcomes. Current evidence does not clarify whether complex FEVAR provides long-term advantages over renal FEVAR. These findings underscore the importance of anatomy-driven, individualized decision-making in complex aortic aneurysm repair.

Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Maastricht University (NL), Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.