Effect of Ecotechnological Chilling Parameters on Carcass Temperature and Mass Loss of Broiler Carcasses

This study comparatively evaluated the performance of three industrial broiler carcass chilling methods—air chilling, combination chilling (air and water spraying), and the Thor Ice ice-slurry system—under commercial processing conditions. A total of 90 Ross 308 carcasses were analyzed (30 per method, in three repetitions). Air chilling and Thor Ice chilling were conducted for 1 h 45 min at 4000 birds/h, whereas combination chilling lasted 3 h at 7200 birds/h. For each carcass, initial and final temperature and weight were recorded to determine chilling loss. Significant differences were observed among the methods (p < 0.05). Combination chilling achieved the lowest final temperature (1.4 °C), while Thor Ice chilling resulted in the smallest chilling loss (−0.47%). The analysis of energy consumption revealed that air chilling had the highest electrical energy use (15,491.6 kWh/h), whereas the Thor Ice system had a lower energy demand (13,511.2 kWh/h). Combination chilling exhibited the highest water consumption (413.7 m3), reflecting the use of water spraying. Based on these findings, combination chilling was the most effective in reducing carcass temperature, while the Thor Ice system provided a technologically efficient alternative with minimal mass loss and reduced energy demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16010054
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Ecotechnological Chilling Parameters on Carcass Temperature and Mass Loss of Broiler Carcasses

Aleksandar Šobot, Sergej Gričar, Diana Bilić-Šobot, Lea-Marija Colarič-Jakše
Agriculture
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Effect of Ecotechnological Chilling Parameters on Carcass Temperature and Mass Loss of Broiler Carcasses

Aleksandar Šobot, Sergej Gričar, Diana Bilić-Šobot, Lea-Marija Colarič-Jakše
article en

Abstract

This study comparatively evaluated the performance of three industrial broiler carcass chilling methods—air chilling, combination chilling (air and water spraying), and the Thor Ice ice-slurry system—under commercial processing conditions. A total of 90 Ross 308 carcasses were analyzed (30 per method, in three repetitions). Air chilling and Thor Ice chilling were conducted for 1 h 45 min at 4000 birds/h, whereas combination chilling lasted 3 h at 7200 birds/h. For each carcass, initial and final temperature and weight were recorded to determine chilling loss. Significant differences were observed among the methods (p < 0.05). Combination chilling achieved the lowest final temperature (1.4 °C), while Thor Ice chilling resulted in the smallest chilling loss (−0.47%). The analysis of energy consumption revealed that air chilling had the highest electrical energy use (15,491.6 kWh/h), whereas the Thor Ice system had a lower energy demand (13,511.2 kWh/h). Combination chilling exhibited the highest water consumption (413.7 m3), reflecting the use of water spraying. Based on these findings, combination chilling was the most effective in reducing carcass temperature, while the Thor Ice system provided a technologically efficient alternative with minimal mass loss and reduced energy demand.

AgricultureVol. 16(1)
Perutnina Ptuj (Slovenia) (SI), School of Business and Management Novo Mesto (SI)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.