Estimating waterfowl breeding pair and brood densities using distance sampling with uncrewed aerial systems

Abstract Wildlife management relies on effective methods to estimate population indices, which are crucial for understanding the status and trends of wildlife populations and the factors that influence their persistence. Detection of wildlife during surveys is rarely perfect, and therefore, biologists often need to account for observation bias. Biologists have conducted surveys of waterfowl since the 1950s using a combination of aerial (fixed‐wing aircraft) and ground‐based methods to account for imperfect detection, where some fraction of individuals are missed by the aerial observer. If ground‐based observers detect all individuals in a subset of the total area surveyed by the aerial crew, then a visual correction factor can be used to adjust counts from the aerial observers. However, the assumption that ground observers are detecting every individual is unlikely and can potentially lead to biased population estimates. We conducted breeding waterfowl surveys in Wisconsin during 2022 and 2023. We collected observations of duck pairs and broods using uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) equipped with thermal cameras, as these tools have been found to improve detection of many wildlife species. We flew UAS surveys along transects and employed distance sampling to estimate duck densities while accounting for imperfect detection. This can be accomplished by recording the distance at which birds are detected and fitting a detection function to the data, which models detection probability and excludes the need for two independent observers. We detected 773 pairs and 573 broods during both years of our study. Our average density estimates of pairs (6.76 pairs/km 2 ) and broods (1.32 broods/km 2 ) were comparable to other estimates within our region. Additionally, the characteristics of our detection functions, including the expected decline in detection with distance, signified that our top distance sampling models fit the data well, which is necessary for reliable density estimation. Practical implication . Performing a distance sampling analysis using UAS equipped with thermal cameras can be used as a method to monitor breeding waterfowl and produce reliable population metrics. Furthermore, this approach has potential for surveying waterfowl in other regions or during different stages of the life cycle and should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70177
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating waterfowl breeding pair and brood densities using distance sampling with uncrewed aerial systems

Benjamin S. Sedinger, Amy A. Shipley, Amanda E. Griswold
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Estimating waterfowl breeding pair and brood densities using distance sampling with uncrewed aerial systems

Benjamin S. Sedinger, Amy A. Shipley, Amanda E. Griswold
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildlife management relies on effective methods to estimate population indices, which are crucial for understanding the status and trends of wildlife populations and the factors that influence their persistence. Detection of wildlife during surveys is rarely perfect, and therefore, biologists often need to account for observation bias. Biologists have conducted surveys of waterfowl since the 1950s using a combination of aerial (fixed‐wing aircraft) and ground‐based methods to account for imperfect detection, where some fraction of individuals are missed by the aerial observer. If ground‐based observers detect all individuals in a subset of the total area surveyed by the aerial crew, then a visual correction factor can be used to adjust counts from the aerial observers. However, the assumption that ground observers are detecting every individual is unlikely and can potentially lead to biased population estimates. We conducted breeding waterfowl surveys in Wisconsin during 2022 and 2023. We collected observations of duck pairs and broods using uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) equipped with thermal cameras, as these tools have been found to improve detection of many wildlife species. We flew UAS surveys along transects and employed distance sampling to estimate duck densities while accounting for imperfect detection. This can be accomplished by recording the distance at which birds are detected and fitting a detection function to the data, which models detection probability and excludes the need for two independent observers. We detected 773 pairs and 573 broods during both years of our study. Our average density estimates of pairs (6.76 pairs/km 2 ) and broods (1.32 broods/km 2 ) were comparable to other estimates within our region. Additionally, the characteristics of our detection functions, including the expected decline in detection with distance, signified that our top distance sampling models fit the data well, which is necessary for reliable density estimation. Practical implication . Performing a distance sampling analysis using UAS equipped with thermal cameras can be used as a method to monitor breeding waterfowl and produce reliable population metrics. Furthermore, this approach has potential for surveying waterfowl in other regions or during different stages of the life cycle and should be considered.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 7(1)
University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point (US), Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.