“The Worst Is When You Peel It and See That There Is a Worm”: A Network Semantic Analysis of Online Reactions Following Control Portugal’s Controversial Instagram Post

This study analyzes the followers’ reactions to Control Portugal, which removed a humorous post from its Instagram page within hours after it was perceived by the public as transphobic. Semantic network analysis was used to identify key themes and discourse patterns in 9384 comments. The findings show that the brand’s distinctive authenticity split public opinion. Some users found the post offensive, whereas others viewed its removal as an act of censorship. After the official apology, the brand’s calculated return to humor and authenticity helped stabilize the conversation in parts of the network, easing the initial polarization. The case study thus highlights the importance of brands designing communication strategies that combine creativity with social responsibility and that ensure digital brand management not only mobilizes but also respects ethical principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Media Ethics
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2025.2608239
Primary Topic
Humor Studies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Worst Is When You Peel It and See That There Is a Worm”: A Network Semantic Analysis of Online Reactions Following Control Portugal’s Controversial Instagram Post

Hadassa Guimarães Oliveira, Rui Bruno Santos, Bruno Frutuoso Costa
Journal of Media Ethics
Humor Studies and Applications
article

“The Worst Is When You Peel It and See That There Is a Worm”: A Network Semantic Analysis of Online Reactions Following Control Portugal’s Controversial Instagram Post

Hadassa Guimarães Oliveira, Rui Bruno Santos, Bruno Frutuoso Costa
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the followers’ reactions to Control Portugal, which removed a humorous post from its Instagram page within hours after it was perceived by the public as transphobic. Semantic network analysis was used to identify key themes and discourse patterns in 9384 comments. The findings show that the brand’s distinctive authenticity split public opinion. Some users found the post offensive, whereas others viewed its removal as an act of censorship. After the official apology, the brand’s calculated return to humor and authenticity helped stabilize the conversation in parts of the network, easing the initial polarization. The case study thus highlights the importance of brands designing communication strategies that combine creativity with social responsibility and that ensure digital brand management not only mobilizes but also respects ethical principles.

Journal of Media Ethics
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), Cardiff University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Humor Studies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.