Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by depression of cardiac function that leads to low blood pressure, coronary ischemia, and further decreased cardiac contractility resulting in tissue hypoxemia. The condition is associated with high early mortality, approaching 50%, which is largely influenced by the underlying etiologic factors. In infarct-related cardiogenic shock, rapid restoration of coronary blood flow substantially reduces mortality. Mechanical circulatory support devices offer hemodynamic stabilization and improved outcomes in carefully selected patients, although optimal patient selection and timing of initiation of mechanical circulatory support remain areas of active investigation. Although there have been advances in coronary revascularization techniques and mechanical circulatory support devices, overall survival in cardiogenic shock has improved only modestly. Therefore, future research should focus on refining treatment algorithms, optimizing device use, and developing new strategies to address the high mortality associated with cardiogenic shock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra2312086
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiogenic Shock

Holger Thiele, Christian Hassager
5 citations
New England Journal of Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
3.37
article

Cardiogenic Shock

Holger Thiele, Christian Hassager
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by depression of cardiac function that leads to low blood pressure, coronary ischemia, and further decreased cardiac contractility resulting in tissue hypoxemia. The condition is associated with high early mortality, approaching 50%, which is largely influenced by the underlying etiologic factors. In infarct-related cardiogenic shock, rapid restoration of coronary blood flow substantially reduces mortality. Mechanical circulatory support devices offer hemodynamic stabilization and improved outcomes in carefully selected patients, although optimal patient selection and timing of initiation of mechanical circulatory support remain areas of active investigation. Although there have been advances in coronary revascularization techniques and mechanical circulatory support devices, overall survival in cardiogenic shock has improved only modestly. Therefore, future research should focus on refining treatment algorithms, optimizing device use, and developing new strategies to address the high mortality associated with cardiogenic shock.

New England Journal of MedicineVol. 394(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Leipzig Heart Institute (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cardiogenic Shock — Holger Thiele, Christian Hassager · New England Journal of Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS