Designing Robust Ukrainian GMO laws for Post-War Recovery: Facilitation of International Trade and the Bioeconomy

Abstract This article explores the development of Ukraine’s legal framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the context of European Union integration and post-war recovery. It analyses key regulatory challenges, including outdated biosafety laws, insufficient enforcement mechanisms and gaps in GMO detection and co-existence frameworks. Focus is placed on the 2023 Ukrainian GMO Law, which aligns with EU standards but is subject to delayed implementation. The article examines the legal tension between the EU’s interpretation of the precautionary principle in GMO law and Ukraine’s WTO obligations, highlighting the need for balanced, science-based regulation. In light of wartime agricultural disruption, the article argues that a robust, science-based GMO regulatory regime is essential for ensuring biosafety, facilitating market access and enabling the development of a resilient bioeconomy. GMO reform is thus positioned as a strategic necessity for Ukraine’s legal modernisation, economic recovery and long-term integration into the European and global systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10073
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Robust Ukrainian GMO laws for Post-War Recovery: Facilitation of International Trade and the Bioeconomy

Dmytro Fedchyshyn, Kai Purnhagen, І. В. Ігнатенко
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Designing Robust Ukrainian GMO laws for Post-War Recovery: Facilitation of International Trade and the Bioeconomy

Dmytro Fedchyshyn, Kai Purnhagen, І. В. Ігнатенко
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the development of Ukraine’s legal framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the context of European Union integration and post-war recovery. It analyses key regulatory challenges, including outdated biosafety laws, insufficient enforcement mechanisms and gaps in GMO detection and co-existence frameworks. Focus is placed on the 2023 Ukrainian GMO Law, which aligns with EU standards but is subject to delayed implementation. The article examines the legal tension between the EU’s interpretation of the precautionary principle in GMO law and Ukraine’s WTO obligations, highlighting the need for balanced, science-based regulation. In light of wartime agricultural disruption, the article argues that a robust, science-based GMO regulatory regime is essential for ensuring biosafety, facilitating market access and enabling the development of a resilient bioeconomy. GMO reform is thus positioned as a strategic necessity for Ukraine’s legal modernisation, economic recovery and long-term integration into the European and global systems.

European Journal of Risk Regulation
National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic (UA), University of Bayreuth (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.