A Comparison of Generation–Retention–Expulsion in Felsic and Carbonate Laminated Shale by Semi-Open Thermal Pyrolysis: Implications for Shale Oil Exploration

Paleogene lacustrine shale is a key source rock for large oil reserves in China and a major target for shale oil exploration. However, differences in the chemical characteristics of felsic and carbonate shales during burial and thermal evolution remain poorly understood. This study evaluates hydrocarbon generation and expulsion efficiency in these shale types using pyrolysis experiments on lower Paleocene Kongdian Formation samples (Type I) from the Eastern China Sedimentary Basin. Results show that felsic shale has higher hydrocarbon generation capacity than carbonate shale. During pyrolysis, carbonate shale retained ~119 mg/g more oil but expelled 184 mg/g less than felsic shale. Felsic shale reached peak oil generation and retention faster but with lower retention efficiency. The larger volume of residual hydrocarbons in felsic shale facilitated earlier expulsion onset, higher yields of gaseous hydrocarbons, and superior gas expulsion efficiency. While both shales exhibited similar thermal evolution trends for hydrocarbon gases, methane proportions and gas-oil ratios (GOR) differed significantly. Carbon loss was comparable during the oil window, but felsic shale lost more carbon overall. At higher temperatures, n-alkanes in residual oil decreased sharply, with lighter oil retained at advanced maturity, increasing GOR and reducing heavy hydrocarbons. These findings demonstrate the effective hydrocarbon potential of medium-high TOC felsic and carbonate shales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16010009
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Generation–Retention–Expulsion in Felsic and Carbonate Laminated Shale by Semi-Open Thermal Pyrolysis: Implications for Shale Oil Exploration

Wendi Peng, Xiaoping Liu, Xiugang Pu, Quansheng Guan et al.
Geosciences
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

A Comparison of Generation–Retention–Expulsion in Felsic and Carbonate Laminated Shale by Semi-Open Thermal Pyrolysis: Implications for Shale Oil Exploration

Wendi Peng, Xiaoping Liu, Xiugang Pu, Quansheng Guan, Biao Sun, Wenya Jiang, Fengming Jin, Gaohang Jia, Xianzheng Zhao, Tian Liu, Changwei Chen, Zuxian Hua
article en

Abstract

Paleogene lacustrine shale is a key source rock for large oil reserves in China and a major target for shale oil exploration. However, differences in the chemical characteristics of felsic and carbonate shales during burial and thermal evolution remain poorly understood. This study evaluates hydrocarbon generation and expulsion efficiency in these shale types using pyrolysis experiments on lower Paleocene Kongdian Formation samples (Type I) from the Eastern China Sedimentary Basin. Results show that felsic shale has higher hydrocarbon generation capacity than carbonate shale. During pyrolysis, carbonate shale retained ~119 mg/g more oil but expelled 184 mg/g less than felsic shale. Felsic shale reached peak oil generation and retention faster but with lower retention efficiency. The larger volume of residual hydrocarbons in felsic shale facilitated earlier expulsion onset, higher yields of gaseous hydrocarbons, and superior gas expulsion efficiency. While both shales exhibited similar thermal evolution trends for hydrocarbon gases, methane proportions and gas-oil ratios (GOR) differed significantly. Carbon loss was comparable during the oil window, but felsic shale lost more carbon overall. At higher temperatures, n-alkanes in residual oil decreased sharply, with lighter oil retained at advanced maturity, increasing GOR and reducing heavy hydrocarbons. These findings demonstrate the effective hydrocarbon potential of medium-high TOC felsic and carbonate shales.

GeosciencesVol. 16(1)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China National Petroleum Corporation, PetroChina Company Limited, National Science and Technology Major Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.