Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies—A Systematic Review

<b>Background:</b> Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterised by inflammation, demyelination, and progressive neurodegeneration. Although current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce relapse rates and inflammatory activity, they rarely stop long-term progression or repair neurological damage. In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as promising approaches to promote immune regulation and neuroregeneration in MS. <b>Methods:</b> This review summarises the current clinical evidence from studies in humans investigating cell-based treatments for MS, including autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and neural stem or progenitor cells (NSCs). A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on human clinical trials that met specific inclusion criteria. <b>Results:</b> Prevailing findings show that AHSCT provides the most consistent benefit, achieving long-term immune reconstitution and remission in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), although it carries procedural risks. MSC therapies have demonstrated good safety and biological activity, especially when delivered intrathecally (IT) in progressive MS, though clinical results remain variable. <b>Conclusions:</b> NSC-based treatments are still at an early stage of clinical research but show potential for CNS repair. The main limitations across studies include differences in protocols, small sample sizes, and short follow-up periods. Further large-scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm long-term efficacy, define optimal delivery methods, and establish standardised clinical protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010030
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies—A Systematic Review

Doddy Denise Ojeda-Hernández, B. Selma-Calvo, Ola Kamal, María Teresa Larriba-González et al.
Pharmaceutics
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies—A Systematic Review

Doddy Denise Ojeda-Hernández, B. Selma-Calvo, Ola Kamal, María Teresa Larriba-González, Ulises Gómez-Pinedo, Jordi A. Matías‐Guiu, Lucía Martín-Blanco, Jorge Matias-Guiu, Marina García-Martín
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterised by inflammation, demyelination, and progressive neurodegeneration. Although current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce relapse rates and inflammatory activity, they rarely stop long-term progression or repair neurological damage. In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as promising approaches to promote immune regulation and neuroregeneration in MS. <b>Methods:</b> This review summarises the current clinical evidence from studies in humans investigating cell-based treatments for MS, including autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and neural stem or progenitor cells (NSCs). A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on human clinical trials that met specific inclusion criteria. <b>Results:</b> Prevailing findings show that AHSCT provides the most consistent benefit, achieving long-term immune reconstitution and remission in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), although it carries procedural risks. MSC therapies have demonstrated good safety and biological activity, especially when delivered intrathecally (IT) in progressive MS, though clinical results remain variable. <b>Conclusions:</b> NSC-based treatments are still at an early stage of clinical research but show potential for CNS repair. The main limitations across studies include differences in protocols, small sample sizes, and short follow-up periods. Further large-scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm long-term efficacy, define optimal delivery methods, and establish standardised clinical protocols.

PharmaceuticsVol. 18(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.