Video laryngoscope versus disposcope endoscope for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Laryngeal tumors can cause significant anatomical distortion, making tracheal intubation challenging. Compared to video laryngoscope (VL), intubation using a Disposcope endoscope (DE) offers flexibility and allows for better navigation around obstructive lesions in the upper airway. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of DE and VL for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Eighty patients with anticipated difficult intubation due to laryngeal tumors undergoing elective surgery were included and randomly allocated to either the DE group (n = 40) or the VL group (n = 40). The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included intubation time, hemodynamic response, and the incidence of complications related to intubation. A total of 80 subjects (61 male/19 female, 30 to 81 years old) were included in the final analysis. The first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was significantly higher in the DE group compared with the VL group (97.5% vs. 77.5%; mean difference [95% CI]: 20% [5.5 to 35.1]; P = 0.007). The intubation time was reduced in the DE group compared to the VL group (28.5 ± 6.7 s vs. 39.0 ± 10.0 s, mean difference [95% CI]: 10.5 s [6.7 to 14.3]; P < 0.001). Compared to DE, VL exhibited a higher heart rate one minute after intubation (71.1 ± 10.9 bpm vs. 78.3 ± 12.8 bpm; mean difference [95% CI]: 7.2 bpm [1.9 to 12.5]; P = 0.008). The incidence of postoperative airway complications was not significantly different between the two groups. The DE showed a higher first-attempt success rate and a shorter intubation time than the VL for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in ENT patients undergoing general anesthesia. Chinese Clinicaltrials Identifier: ChiCTR2300068449. Trial Registration Date: February 20, 2023. Date of enrolment of the first research participant: March 1, 2023. Chinese Clinical Trials Identifier ChiCTR2300068449.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03566-1
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Video laryngoscope versus disposcope endoscope for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Jie Jia, Peixia Wu, Yilei Shen, Han Liu et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Video laryngoscope versus disposcope endoscope for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Jie Jia, Peixia Wu, Yilei Shen, Han Liu, Lili Feng, Yirong Cai, Yuan Han, Hongyan Xiao, Yingjie Wang, Wenxian Li, Yanan Xiao
article en

Abstract

Laryngeal tumors can cause significant anatomical distortion, making tracheal intubation challenging. Compared to video laryngoscope (VL), intubation using a Disposcope endoscope (DE) offers flexibility and allows for better navigation around obstructive lesions in the upper airway. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of DE and VL for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Eighty patients with anticipated difficult intubation due to laryngeal tumors undergoing elective surgery were included and randomly allocated to either the DE group (n = 40) or the VL group (n = 40). The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included intubation time, hemodynamic response, and the incidence of complications related to intubation. A total of 80 subjects (61 male/19 female, 30 to 81 years old) were included in the final analysis. The first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was significantly higher in the DE group compared with the VL group (97.5% vs. 77.5%; mean difference [95% CI]: 20% [5.5 to 35.1]; P = 0.007). The intubation time was reduced in the DE group compared to the VL group (28.5 ± 6.7 s vs. 39.0 ± 10.0 s, mean difference [95% CI]: 10.5 s [6.7 to 14.3]; P < 0.001). Compared to DE, VL exhibited a higher heart rate one minute after intubation (71.1 ± 10.9 bpm vs. 78.3 ± 12.8 bpm; mean difference [95% CI]: 7.2 bpm [1.9 to 12.5]; P = 0.008). The incidence of postoperative airway complications was not significantly different between the two groups. The DE showed a higher first-attempt success rate and a shorter intubation time than the VL for anticipated laryngeal tumor related difficult intubation in ENT patients undergoing general anesthesia. Chinese Clinicaltrials Identifier: ChiCTR2300068449. Trial Registration Date: February 20, 2023. Date of enrolment of the first research participant: March 1, 2023. Chinese Clinical Trials Identifier ChiCTR2300068449.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Xuzhou (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.