Dancing with the algorithm: a framework to navigate knowledge and autonomy in AI-assisted managerial decisions

Purpose While artificial intelligence (AI) systems (assistive, human-in-the-loop decision support systems) increasingly participate in complex organizational judgments, their integration into knowledge processes raises fundamental challenges for autonomy, trust, and epistemic agency. This study aims to develop a dynamic, phase-specific framework that explains how autonomy evolves in relation to the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy and foundational knowledge management concepts during AI-assisted managerial decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The study draws on 122 in-depth interviews with senior professionals across diverse sectors, complemented by two expert focus groups. Data were analyzed using the Gioia Methodology to support inductive theory development and generate a grounded conceptual framework. Findings The authors develop the Human–AI autonomy loop (HAIL) framework, mapping decision-making to four recursive phases (frame, evaluate, commit, enact) and DIKW layers, each linked to distinct DIKW layers and autonomy configurations. Autonomy is a situated, distributed practice: managers preserve discretion through interpretive buffers, overrides and moral authorship. Trust in AI is recalibrated by phase, especially as decisions move from information to judgment. HAIL shows that autonomy is sustained through reflexive knowledge practices. Originality/value This study advances the knowledge management literature by integrating autonomy, trust and epistemic agency into a unified framework of AI-assisted decision-making. It reinterprets the DIKW model not as a linear information hierarchy, but as a socio-technical terrain where knowledge becomes actionable only when embedded in situated judgment and ethical authorship. The HAIL framework offers both theoretical insights and practical guidance for preserving human discretion and organizational wisdom in AI-assisted environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2025-0870
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dancing with the algorithm: a framework to navigate knowledge and autonomy in AI-assisted managerial decisions

Alexis J. Bañón-Gomis, Matteo Cristofaro
2 citations
Journal of Knowledge Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Dancing with the algorithm: a framework to navigate knowledge and autonomy in AI-assisted managerial decisions

Alexis J. Bañón-Gomis, Matteo Cristofaro
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose While artificial intelligence (AI) systems (assistive, human-in-the-loop decision support systems) increasingly participate in complex organizational judgments, their integration into knowledge processes raises fundamental challenges for autonomy, trust, and epistemic agency. This study aims to develop a dynamic, phase-specific framework that explains how autonomy evolves in relation to the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy and foundational knowledge management concepts during AI-assisted managerial decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The study draws on 122 in-depth interviews with senior professionals across diverse sectors, complemented by two expert focus groups. Data were analyzed using the Gioia Methodology to support inductive theory development and generate a grounded conceptual framework. Findings The authors develop the Human–AI autonomy loop (HAIL) framework, mapping decision-making to four recursive phases (frame, evaluate, commit, enact) and DIKW layers, each linked to distinct DIKW layers and autonomy configurations. Autonomy is a situated, distributed practice: managers preserve discretion through interpretive buffers, overrides and moral authorship. Trust in AI is recalibrated by phase, especially as decisions move from information to judgment. HAIL shows that autonomy is sustained through reflexive knowledge practices. Originality/value This study advances the knowledge management literature by integrating autonomy, trust and epistemic agency into a unified framework of AI-assisted decision-making. It reinterprets the DIKW model not as a linear information hierarchy, but as a socio-technical terrain where knowledge becomes actionable only when embedded in situated judgment and ethical authorship. The HAIL framework offers both theoretical insights and practical guidance for preserving human discretion and organizational wisdom in AI-assisted environments.

Journal of Knowledge ManagementVol. 30(11)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.