How do adult inpatients with ARFID or AN-R compare on self-report eating disorder assessments?

The Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q) and the Eating Disorders in Youth Questionnaire (EDY-Q) were developed to assess avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), but research is ongoing regarding their discriminant validity. This study examined scores of adult inpatients with ARFID or anorexia nervosa, restricting type (AN-R) on the PARDI-AR-Q, EDY-Q, and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) at admission to a medical stabilization unit for severe eating disorders. Response differences between 78 adult inpatients with ARFID or AN-R were analyzed using a two-sample t-test or Fisher's exact test. Sensitivity and specificity of self-report measures were examined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Patients with AN-R had significantly higher severity of impact and lower concern about aversive consequences scores than patients with ARFID on the PARDI-AR-Q (<i>p</i> < .001), with no significant differences on sensory-based avoidance or lack of interest or EDY-Q total score. Patients with AN-R scored significantly higher on all domains of the EDE-Q (<i>p's</i> < .001) and the EDE-Q subscales had better discrimination than ARFID measures. This study provides further evidence of the need for assessments that can distinguish ARFID from AN, and may also highlight the need for future research on the nosological accuracy of differentiating these disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eating Disorders
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2025.2608345
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do adult inpatients with ARFID or AN-R compare on self-report eating disorder assessments?

Philip S. Mehler, Kamila Cass, T. E. Joiner, Jamie Manwaring et al.
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

How do adult inpatients with ARFID or AN-R compare on self-report eating disorder assessments?

Philip S. Mehler, Kamila Cass, T. E. Joiner, Jamie Manwaring, Joshua Epstein, Sara Prostko, Renee D. Rienecke
article en

Abstract

The Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q) and the Eating Disorders in Youth Questionnaire (EDY-Q) were developed to assess avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), but research is ongoing regarding their discriminant validity. This study examined scores of adult inpatients with ARFID or anorexia nervosa, restricting type (AN-R) on the PARDI-AR-Q, EDY-Q, and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) at admission to a medical stabilization unit for severe eating disorders. Response differences between 78 adult inpatients with ARFID or AN-R were analyzed using a two-sample t-test or Fisher's exact test. Sensitivity and specificity of self-report measures were examined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Patients with AN-R had significantly higher severity of impact and lower concern about aversive consequences scores than patients with ARFID on the PARDI-AR-Q (<i>p</i> < .001), with no significant differences on sensory-based avoidance or lack of interest or EDY-Q total score. Patients with AN-R scored significantly higher on all domains of the EDE-Q (<i>p's</i> < .001) and the EDE-Q subscales had better discrimination than ARFID measures. This study provides further evidence of the need for assessments that can distinguish ARFID from AN, and may also highlight the need for future research on the nosological accuracy of differentiating these disorders.

Eating Disorders
Florida State University (US), Denver Health Medical Center (US), Centers for Behavioral Health (US), Global Foundation for Eating Disorders (US), Health and Hospital Corporation (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.