179P Gemcitabine as a therapeutic option following immunotherapy progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (GEM-TOP study)

Results: Of the 198 patients, 66 received definitive immunotherapy and 132 patients received prolonged immunotherapy.The groups were well-balanced across race, insurance status, social vulnerability index, histology, and ECOG.Overall survival did not differ between the two groups as 94 (71.2%) patients in the prolonged and 46 (69.7%) patients in the definitive group were alive at 5 years (p=0.457).The most common reason for discontinuation in the definitive group was end of planned therapy (54.7%) followed by progression of disease (26.6%), then toxicity without progression (12.5%).Conclusions: Maintenance immunotherapy duration has not been clearly defined and is extremely practice-dependent.Stopping immunotherapy at two years has benefits in terms of biologic and financial toxicity but also risks the chance of recurrence and can lead to patient anxiety.Our data supports previous studies demonstrating that there is no survival benefit to continuing immunotherapy past two years of therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Immuno-Oncology Technology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotech.2025.101262
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

179P Gemcitabine as a therapeutic option following immunotherapy progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (GEM-TOP study)

J.A. Nunez Sobrino, J. Baena Espinar, L. Paz-Ares, H. Bote De Cabo et al.
Immuno-Oncology Technology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

179P Gemcitabine as a therapeutic option following immunotherapy progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (GEM-TOP study)

J.A. Nunez Sobrino, J. Baena Espinar, L. Paz-Ares, H. Bote De Cabo, J. Zugazagoitia, M. Peressini lvarez, R.H. Calle Valdez, C. Torres-Mallma, M. Zurera Berjaga, M.M. Herrera Juarez, S. Ponce Aix, J. Torres Jimenez
article en

Abstract

Results: Of the 198 patients, 66 received definitive immunotherapy and 132 patients received prolonged immunotherapy.The groups were well-balanced across race, insurance status, social vulnerability index, histology, and ECOG.Overall survival did not differ between the two groups as 94 (71.2%) patients in the prolonged and 46 (69.7%) patients in the definitive group were alive at 5 years (p=0.457).The most common reason for discontinuation in the definitive group was end of planned therapy (54.7%) followed by progression of disease (26.6%), then toxicity without progression (12.5%).Conclusions: Maintenance immunotherapy duration has not been clearly defined and is extremely practice-dependent.Stopping immunotherapy at two years has benefits in terms of biologic and financial toxicity but also risks the chance of recurrence and can lead to patient anxiety.Our data supports previous studies demonstrating that there is no survival benefit to continuing immunotherapy past two years of therapy.

Immuno-Oncology TechnologyVol. 28
National Hospital (IN), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), EsSALUD (PE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.