Automation and its Discontents: Leveraging Automation to Safeguard Humanity
This paper examines strategies for establishing a long-lasting ban on advanced AI research to mitigate existential risks from artificial intelligence. We evaluate Cappelen, Goldstein, and Hawthorne’s proposal to leverage AI accidents as warning shots and find it faces substantial ethical and practical challenges. As an alternative, we propose leveraging social unrest from rapid AI-driven automation. We argue that widespread job displacement could mobilise global labour movements against AI advancement, creating sufficient political pressure for an enforceable international ban on frontier AI research, and that this offers a more viable path to human survial in the face of advanced AI than current alternatives.
Authors
- Aksel Braanen Sterri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4804-8033)
- Peder Skjelbred
Institutions
- University of Oslo (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/phai/2025.11844
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00