Impact of Integrated Pathologic Score on Treatment Outcomes for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract Objective The Integrated Pathologic Score of the College of American Pathologists (IPSCAP) grading system independently predicts overall survival (OS) in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after non-ablative neoadjuvant therapy. This study analyzes the impact of IPSCAP on the outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study queried patients with BRPC treated between 2013 and 2023 with either neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-abraxane and SBRT, who underwent resection. SBRT was categorized at ablative dose thresholds of ≥40 or 45 Gy. The IPSCAP score was calculated by summing tumor regression grade, pathologic tumor stage, and nodal status for patients with more than 12 lymph nodes examined and was classified into 3 groups: group 1 (score 0-3), group 2 (score 4-6), and group 3 (score 7-8). The presence of actionable somatic and germline mutations was identified. OS was defined as the time from biopsy to death or last contact (in months). Statistical analyses were performed using R software. Results Overall, per-unit decrease of IPSCAP was significantly associated with increased median OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.770, 95% CI 0.670-0.886, P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significant difference between stratification of IPSCAP by group, with group 1 having significantly less risk of death than groups 2 and 3. Similar results were found when patients were stratified by their neoadjuvant chemotherapy: FOLFIRINOX (HR = 0.742, 95% CI 0.604-0.912, P < .01) and gemcitabine-abraxane (HR = 0.804, 95% CI 0.667-0.969, P = .022). Patients treated with ≥45 Gy were significantly more likely to have group 1 pathologic scores and had higher odds of achieving group 1 compared with those treated with <45 Gy (odds ratio, 2.458; 95% CI 1.060-5.783; P = .027, Fisher exact test). Conclusions This study suggests that IPSCAP incorporation is a reliable prognosticator in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 5-fraction SBRT of OS in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, warranting further studies with dose escalation in this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Radiation Oncology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37549/aro-d-25-0052
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Integrated Pathologic Score on Treatment Outcomes for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Andrew J. Sinnamon, María L. Sandoval, Larry N. Silverman, Gabrielle R. Chin et al.
Applied Radiation Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Impact of Integrated Pathologic Score on Treatment Outcomes for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Andrew J. Sinnamon, María L. Sandoval, Larry N. Silverman, Gabrielle R. Chin, Nicole Nardella, José M. Pimiento, Dae Won Kim, Sarah E. Hoffe, Torrin Jacobsen, Adrianna Oraiqat, Mokenge Malafa, Russell F. Palm, Jason W. Denbo, Tiago Biachi de Castria, Pamela Hodul, Jessica M. Frakes, Jin-Ju Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The Integrated Pathologic Score of the College of American Pathologists (IPSCAP) grading system independently predicts overall survival (OS) in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after non-ablative neoadjuvant therapy. This study analyzes the impact of IPSCAP on the outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study queried patients with BRPC treated between 2013 and 2023 with either neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-abraxane and SBRT, who underwent resection. SBRT was categorized at ablative dose thresholds of ≥40 or 45 Gy. The IPSCAP score was calculated by summing tumor regression grade, pathologic tumor stage, and nodal status for patients with more than 12 lymph nodes examined and was classified into 3 groups: group 1 (score 0-3), group 2 (score 4-6), and group 3 (score 7-8). The presence of actionable somatic and germline mutations was identified. OS was defined as the time from biopsy to death or last contact (in months). Statistical analyses were performed using R software. Results Overall, per-unit decrease of IPSCAP was significantly associated with increased median OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.770, 95% CI 0.670-0.886, P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significant difference between stratification of IPSCAP by group, with group 1 having significantly less risk of death than groups 2 and 3. Similar results were found when patients were stratified by their neoadjuvant chemotherapy: FOLFIRINOX (HR = 0.742, 95% CI 0.604-0.912, P < .01) and gemcitabine-abraxane (HR = 0.804, 95% CI 0.667-0.969, P = .022). Patients treated with ≥45 Gy were significantly more likely to have group 1 pathologic scores and had higher odds of achieving group 1 compared with those treated with <45 Gy (odds ratio, 2.458; 95% CI 1.060-5.783; P = .027, Fisher exact test). Conclusions This study suggests that IPSCAP incorporation is a reliable prognosticator in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 5-fraction SBRT of OS in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, warranting further studies with dose escalation in this population.

Applied Radiation OncologyVol. 1(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.