A single-center analysis of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction according to current heart failure guidelines

Background: Recent landmark trials have shown that several pharmacologic therapies improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), leading to updates in heart failure (HF) management guidelines. However, real-world adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in these populations remains uncertain. This study evaluated GDMT prescription patterns in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF based on the 2022 Korean Heart Failure Society guidelines.Methods: This single-center observational study included patients newly diagnosed with HF between January and December 2023, identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients without recent echocardiographic or N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide data, those with reduced ejection fraction, or those with end-stage renal disease were excluded. Electronic medical records were reviewed to assess GDMT prescription rates.Results: Among 615 patients (mean age, 68.9 years; 52.4% female), 568 had HFpEF and 47 had HFmrEF. Common comorbidities included hypertension (75.5%), diabetes mellitus (50.9%), ischemic heart disease (43.7%), and chronic kidney disease (22.6%). Overall prescription rates were 73.3% for renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, 83.7% for beta-blockers, 41.1% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and 42.9% for sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). SGLT2i use was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in those without (71.6% vs. 13.2%; p<0.001). Angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors and MRAs were more frequently prescribed in HFmrEF than HFpEF. Beta-blocker use was lower in patients aged ≥75 years.Conclusions: A substantial gap persists between guideline recommendations and real-world GDMT use in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, particularly for SGLT2is. Multicenter studies are warranted to further characterize and address this treatment gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kosin Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.25.124
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A single-center analysis of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction according to current heart failure guidelines

S. Kim, Sung Il Im, Jung-Ho Heo, Bong-Joon Kim et al.
1 citations
Kosin Medical Journal
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
1.39
article

A single-center analysis of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction according to current heart failure guidelines

S. Kim, Sung Il Im, Jung-Ho Heo, Bong-Joon Kim, Suhyun Bae
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Recent landmark trials have shown that several pharmacologic therapies improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), leading to updates in heart failure (HF) management guidelines. However, real-world adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in these populations remains uncertain. This study evaluated GDMT prescription patterns in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF based on the 2022 Korean Heart Failure Society guidelines.Methods: This single-center observational study included patients newly diagnosed with HF between January and December 2023, identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients without recent echocardiographic or N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide data, those with reduced ejection fraction, or those with end-stage renal disease were excluded. Electronic medical records were reviewed to assess GDMT prescription rates.Results: Among 615 patients (mean age, 68.9 years; 52.4% female), 568 had HFpEF and 47 had HFmrEF. Common comorbidities included hypertension (75.5%), diabetes mellitus (50.9%), ischemic heart disease (43.7%), and chronic kidney disease (22.6%). Overall prescription rates were 73.3% for renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, 83.7% for beta-blockers, 41.1% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and 42.9% for sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). SGLT2i use was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in those without (71.6% vs. 13.2%; p<0.001). Angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors and MRAs were more frequently prescribed in HFmrEF than HFpEF. Beta-blocker use was lower in patients aged ≥75 years.Conclusions: A substantial gap persists between guideline recommendations and real-world GDMT use in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, particularly for SGLT2is. Multicenter studies are warranted to further characterize and address this treatment gap.

Kosin Medical JournalVol. 40(4)
Kosin University Gospel Hospital (KR), Yang Hospital (KR), Armed Forces Capital Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.