Anchored in the past: The colonial origins of cabotage policy in the Philippines

This article analyses how American colonial-era cabotage laws (1899–1946) entrenched monopolies in the Philippine maritime industry, exemplified by firms like Compañía Marítima. Despite partial liberalization via Republic Act No. 10668 (2015), protections for domestic operators persisted until 2024, when foreign vessels were first permitted on domestic routes. Through an examination of colonial and legislative records, this study reveals how post-colonial elites perpetuated colonial institutions under the guise of nationalist rhetoric, sustaining high costs, weak competition, and a recurring pattern of maritime disasters. Institutional mechanisms such as the 1936 Public Service Act reinforced this path dependence. Applying the framework of Acemoglu and Robinson's ‘Colonial Origins of Comparative Development’ (2001), the article argues that the Philippine cabotage regime evolved from an extractive colonial institution into a rent-seeking system protecting elite interests. In doing so, it contributes to broader debates on the persistence of colonial economic structures in South East Asian maritime policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Maritime History
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08438714251405217
Primary Topic
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anchored in the past: The colonial origins of cabotage policy in the Philippines

Karl Friedrik K. Poblador
International Journal of Maritime History
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
article

Anchored in the past: The colonial origins of cabotage policy in the Philippines

Karl Friedrik K. Poblador
article en

Abstract

This article analyses how American colonial-era cabotage laws (1899–1946) entrenched monopolies in the Philippine maritime industry, exemplified by firms like Compañía Marítima. Despite partial liberalization via Republic Act No. 10668 (2015), protections for domestic operators persisted until 2024, when foreign vessels were first permitted on domestic routes. Through an examination of colonial and legislative records, this study reveals how post-colonial elites perpetuated colonial institutions under the guise of nationalist rhetoric, sustaining high costs, weak competition, and a recurring pattern of maritime disasters. Institutional mechanisms such as the 1936 Public Service Act reinforced this path dependence. Applying the framework of Acemoglu and Robinson's ‘Colonial Origins of Comparative Development’ (2001), the article argues that the Philippine cabotage regime evolved from an extractive colonial institution into a rent-seeking system protecting elite interests. In doing so, it contributes to broader debates on the persistence of colonial economic structures in South East Asian maritime policy.

International Journal of Maritime History
University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.