Diagnostic accuracy and safety of core needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral center

Level of EvidenceLevel III - Retrospective Cohort Study.BackgroundMusculoskeletal lesions commonly present as pain, masses, or incidental imaging findings. Accurate diagnosis is critical for treatment planning. Although open biopsy was historically considered the gold standard, core needle biopsy (CNB) has emerged as a minimally invasive and reliable diagnostic method with a favorable safety profile. The primary objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) for musculoskeletal lesions.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 426 patients who underwent image-guided CNB for musculoskeletal lesions at a single tertiary referral center between January 2014 and December 2020. Patient demographics, biopsy characteristics, and diagnostic outcomes were analyzed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the ROC curve (AUC).ResultsMost patients were adults (82.4%) and male (56.6%). The lower limb was the most common biopsy region (43.2%), with the trunk (26.3%), upper limb (15.5%), and pelvis (14.3%) following in order of frequency. CNB demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.8%, specificity of 72.3%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 82.3% (AUC = 0.855).ConclusionImage-guided CNB provides high diagnostic sensitivity and excellent negative predictive value for musculoskeletal lesions, with a very low complication rate. While it is effective as a first-line diagnostic tool, limitations remain in specificity and tumor subtype confirmation, particularly in heterogeneous or necrotic lesions. Standardized protocols and multidisciplinary interpretation are essential to optimize accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251411641
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of core needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral center

Abdullah Alanazi, Turki Althunayan, Bandar A Ahmed, Wazzan Aljuhani et al.
Journal of orthopaedic surgery
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of core needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral center

Abdullah Alanazi, Turki Althunayan, Bandar A Ahmed, Wazzan Aljuhani, Bayan Altorbak, Tariq I Almunyif
article en

Abstract

Level of EvidenceLevel III - Retrospective Cohort Study.BackgroundMusculoskeletal lesions commonly present as pain, masses, or incidental imaging findings. Accurate diagnosis is critical for treatment planning. Although open biopsy was historically considered the gold standard, core needle biopsy (CNB) has emerged as a minimally invasive and reliable diagnostic method with a favorable safety profile. The primary objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) for musculoskeletal lesions.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 426 patients who underwent image-guided CNB for musculoskeletal lesions at a single tertiary referral center between January 2014 and December 2020. Patient demographics, biopsy characteristics, and diagnostic outcomes were analyzed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the ROC curve (AUC).ResultsMost patients were adults (82.4%) and male (56.6%). The lower limb was the most common biopsy region (43.2%), with the trunk (26.3%), upper limb (15.5%), and pelvis (14.3%) following in order of frequency. CNB demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.8%, specificity of 72.3%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 82.3% (AUC = 0.855).ConclusionImage-guided CNB provides high diagnostic sensitivity and excellent negative predictive value for musculoskeletal lesions, with a very low complication rate. While it is effective as a first-line diagnostic tool, limitations remain in specificity and tumor subtype confirmation, particularly in heterogeneous or necrotic lesions. Standardized protocols and multidisciplinary interpretation are essential to optimize accuracy.

Journal of orthopaedic surgeryVol. 33(3)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), King Abdulaziz Hospital (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.