Evaluating the Performance of AI Large Language Models in Detecting Pediatric Medication Errors Across Languages: A Comparative Study

<b>Objectives</b>: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four AI models, (GPT-5, GPT-4, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini), in detecting medication errors through pediatric case scenarios. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 60 pediatric cases were analyzed for the presence of medication errors, of which only half contained errors. The cases covered four therapeutic systems (respiratory, endocrine, neurology, and infectious). The four models were exposed to the cases in both English and Arabic using a unified prompt. The responses for each model were used to calculate various performance metric cover accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility. Analysis was carried out using SPSS version 22. <b>Results:</b> Microsoft Copilot demonstrated relatively higher accuracy (86.7% in English, 85.0% in Arabic) compared to other models in this dataset, followed by GPT-5 (81.7% in English, 75.0% in Arabic). GPT-4 and Google Gemini had less accuracy, with Gemini having the lowest accuracy across all languages (76.7% in English, and 73.3% in Arabic). Microsoft Copilot showed comparatively higher sensitivity and specificity, particularly in cases of respiratory and infectious diseases. The accuracy in Arabic was lower compared to that of English for the majority of models. Microsoft Copilot exhibited relatively higher reproducibility and inter-run agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.836 English, 0.815 Arabic, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for both), while Gemini showed the lowest reproducibility. For inter-language agreement in general, Copilot showed the highest Cohen's Kappa of 0.701 for English and Arabic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> In our evaluation, Microsoft Copilot demonstrated relatively higher performance in pediatric drug error detection compared to the other AI models. The decreased performance in Arabic points toward the requirement of improved multilingual training for supporting equal AI aid across languages. This study highlights the importance of human oversight and domain-based training for AI tools in pediatric pharmacotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010162
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Performance of AI Large Language Models in Detecting Pediatric Medication Errors Across Languages: A Comparative Study

Eyad A. Qunaibi, Redab Al-Ghawanmeh, Rana K. Abu-Farha, Haneen Abuzaid et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating the Performance of AI Large Language Models in Detecting Pediatric Medication Errors Across Languages: A Comparative Study

Eyad A. Qunaibi, Redab Al-Ghawanmeh, Rana K. Abu-Farha, Haneen Abuzaid, Jena Alalawneh, Muna Sharaf
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four AI models, (GPT-5, GPT-4, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini), in detecting medication errors through pediatric case scenarios. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 60 pediatric cases were analyzed for the presence of medication errors, of which only half contained errors. The cases covered four therapeutic systems (respiratory, endocrine, neurology, and infectious). The four models were exposed to the cases in both English and Arabic using a unified prompt. The responses for each model were used to calculate various performance metric cover accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility. Analysis was carried out using SPSS version 22. <b>Results:</b> Microsoft Copilot demonstrated relatively higher accuracy (86.7% in English, 85.0% in Arabic) compared to other models in this dataset, followed by GPT-5 (81.7% in English, 75.0% in Arabic). GPT-4 and Google Gemini had less accuracy, with Gemini having the lowest accuracy across all languages (76.7% in English, and 73.3% in Arabic). Microsoft Copilot showed comparatively higher sensitivity and specificity, particularly in cases of respiratory and infectious diseases. The accuracy in Arabic was lower compared to that of English for the majority of models. Microsoft Copilot exhibited relatively higher reproducibility and inter-run agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.836 English, 0.815 Arabic, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for both), while Gemini showed the lowest reproducibility. For inter-language agreement in general, Copilot showed the highest Cohen's Kappa of 0.701 for English and Arabic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> In our evaluation, Microsoft Copilot demonstrated relatively higher performance in pediatric drug error detection compared to the other AI models. The decreased performance in Arabic points toward the requirement of improved multilingual training for supporting equal AI aid across languages. This study highlights the importance of human oversight and domain-based training for AI tools in pediatric pharmacotherapy.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(1)
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (JO), Applied Science Private University (JO), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Hashemite University (JO), An-Najah National University (PS), ILC Dover (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.