Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Malignant Upgrade of B3 Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> High-risk (B3) breast lesions are a heterogeneous group with uncertain malignant potential. <b>Methods:</b> We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the ability of artificial-intelligence (AI) models to predict malignant upgrades (a ductal carcinoma in situ or an invasive carcinoma) after biopsy. A comprehensive search of medical and engineering databases through 27 July 2025 identified retrospective studies that developed or validated AI models for upgrade prediction in cohorts with ≥20 B3 lesions and confirmed outcomes at surgical excision or after ≥24 months of follow-up. <b>Results:</b> Three single-center studies (557 lesions, 91 upgrades) met the eligibility criteria. Pooled analysis focused on clinically meaningful operating points rather than raw accuracy metrics. Models tuned for high sensitivity achieved high negative predictive values (pooled 0.95), suggesting reliable identification of lesions suitable for surveillance, but positive predictive values were modest and heterogenous (0.15-1.00), reflecting trade-offs between avoiding missed upgrades and reducing unnecessary excisions. Only two studies reported area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curves, which pooled to 0.72, indicating moderate discrimination. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although limited by small sample sizes and single-center designs, these findings suggest that AI could aid decision-making for B3 lesion management. Prospective multicenter validation and standardized reporting are needed to evaluate clinical utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010075
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Malignant Upgrade of B3 Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Romuald Ferré, Cherie Marie Kuzmiak
Diagnostics
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Malignant Upgrade of B3 Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Romuald Ferré, Cherie Marie Kuzmiak
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> High-risk (B3) breast lesions are a heterogeneous group with uncertain malignant potential. <b>Methods:</b> We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the ability of artificial-intelligence (AI) models to predict malignant upgrades (a ductal carcinoma in situ or an invasive carcinoma) after biopsy. A comprehensive search of medical and engineering databases through 27 July 2025 identified retrospective studies that developed or validated AI models for upgrade prediction in cohorts with ≥20 B3 lesions and confirmed outcomes at surgical excision or after ≥24 months of follow-up. <b>Results:</b> Three single-center studies (557 lesions, 91 upgrades) met the eligibility criteria. Pooled analysis focused on clinically meaningful operating points rather than raw accuracy metrics. Models tuned for high sensitivity achieved high negative predictive values (pooled 0.95), suggesting reliable identification of lesions suitable for surveillance, but positive predictive values were modest and heterogenous (0.15-1.00), reflecting trade-offs between avoiding missed upgrades and reducing unnecessary excisions. Only two studies reported area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curves, which pooled to 0.72, indicating moderate discrimination. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although limited by small sample sizes and single-center designs, these findings suggest that AI could aid decision-making for B3 lesion management. Prospective multicenter validation and standardized reporting are needed to evaluate clinical utility.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.