Effects of canopy and understory nitrogen deposition on key processes of soil nitrogen transformation in a <i>Phyllostachys</i> <i>edulis</i> forest.

Soil nitrogen transformation processes, such as nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification, are important links in nitrogen biogeochemical cycling. Previous studies on the impact of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen transformation process in forest soils have mostly relied on simulating nitrogen deposition under forest canopy, neglecting the interception effect of the canopy and failing to truly reflect the effects of nitrogen deposition. This study focused on the field simulation of canopy understory nitrogen deposition in <i>Phyllostachys</i> <i>edulis</i> forest soil over three years. There were four treatments: canopy nitrogen deposition (CN, nitrogen application rate of 50 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>), understory nitrogen deposition (UN, nitrogen application rate of 50 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>), canopy control (CCK, water equivalent to simulated nitrogen deposition solution), and understory control (UCK, water equivalent to simulated nitrogen deposition solution). We measured soil net nitrogen mineralization and net nitrification rates, as well as soil denitrification rates, to explore the impact mechanisms of different nitrogen deposition methods on key processes of soil nitrogen transformation. The results showed that both canopy and understory nitrogen deposition significantly increased soil net nitrogen mineralization, net nitrification, and denitrification rates, with CN showing an increase of 43.4%, 44.9%, and 33.0% compared to CCK, respectively. The growth rates of UN compared to UCK were 48.6%, 48.7%, and 41.2%, respectively. The increase in soil net nitrogen mineralization rate under nitrogen deposition was mainly caused by the increases in soil soluble organic nitrogen, microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and urease activity. The increase in net nitrification rate was mainly attributed to the abundance of ammonia oxidizing archaea, the activity of nitrifying enzymes, and the increase in MBN. The increase in denitrification rate following nitrogen deposition was induced by the promotion of nitrogen mineralization and nitrification, as well as an increase in the abundance of denitrification functional genes (<i>nirK</i>). In addition, there was no significant difference in soil net nitrogen mineralization and net nitrification rates between CN and UN treatments, but the denitrification rate of soil treated with UN was significantly higher than that of CN, mainly due to the higher abundance of <i>nirK</i> genes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202512.010
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of canopy and understory nitrogen deposition on key processes of soil nitrogen transformation in a Phyllostachys edulis forest.

Man Shi, Zengming Chen, Yan Wang, L I Na et al.
PubMed
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Effects of canopy and understory nitrogen deposition on key processes of soil nitrogen transformation in a Phyllostachys edulis forest.

Man Shi, Zengming Chen, Yan Wang, L I Na, Y U Bing, L I Yong-Fu, Jiang Wen-Ting, Cai Yan-Jiang
article en

Abstract

Soil nitrogen transformation processes, such as nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification, are important links in nitrogen biogeochemical cycling. Previous studies on the impact of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen transformation process in forest soils have mostly relied on simulating nitrogen deposition under forest canopy, neglecting the interception effect of the canopy and failing to truly reflect the effects of nitrogen deposition. This study focused on the field simulation of canopy understory nitrogen deposition in <i>Phyllostachys</i> <i>edulis</i> forest soil over three years. There were four treatments: canopy nitrogen deposition (CN, nitrogen application rate of 50 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>), understory nitrogen deposition (UN, nitrogen application rate of 50 kg·hm<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>), canopy control (CCK, water equivalent to simulated nitrogen deposition solution), and understory control (UCK, water equivalent to simulated nitrogen deposition solution). We measured soil net nitrogen mineralization and net nitrification rates, as well as soil denitrification rates, to explore the impact mechanisms of different nitrogen deposition methods on key processes of soil nitrogen transformation. The results showed that both canopy and understory nitrogen deposition significantly increased soil net nitrogen mineralization, net nitrification, and denitrification rates, with CN showing an increase of 43.4%, 44.9%, and 33.0% compared to CCK, respectively. The growth rates of UN compared to UCK were 48.6%, 48.7%, and 41.2%, respectively. The increase in soil net nitrogen mineralization rate under nitrogen deposition was mainly caused by the increases in soil soluble organic nitrogen, microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and urease activity. The increase in net nitrification rate was mainly attributed to the abundance of ammonia oxidizing archaea, the activity of nitrifying enzymes, and the increase in MBN. The increase in denitrification rate following nitrogen deposition was induced by the promotion of nitrogen mineralization and nitrification, as well as an increase in the abundance of denitrification functional genes (<i>nirK</i>). In addition, there was no significant difference in soil net nitrogen mineralization and net nitrification rates between CN and UN treatments, but the denitrification rate of soil treated with UN was significantly higher than that of CN, mainly due to the higher abundance of <i>nirK</i> genes.

PubMedVol. 36(12)
Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Soil Science (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.